Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220901024827.v3.1.I3aa360986c0e7377ea5e96c116f014ff1ab8c968@changeid>
 <166606235849.3553294.10700447109437637515.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <166606235849.3553294.10700447109437637515.b4-ty@kernel.org>
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:36:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WXGGHTAgH7O6MP3eOp4HLAwkBAOJ9L63ow3PSdkUtCYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document
 additional skus for sc7180 pazquel360
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        yunlong.jia@ecs.corp-partner.google.com, henrysun@google.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, moragues@chromium.org,
        agross@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:15 PM Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 02:49:57 +0000, Yunlong Jia wrote:
> > pazquel360 is an extension project based on pazquel.
> > We create 3 sku on pazquel360:
> >    sku 20 for LTE with physical SIM _and_ eSIM and WiFi
> >    sku 21 for WiFi only
> >    sku 22 for LTE with only a physical SIM
> >  Both sku20 and sku22 are LTE SKUs.
> >  One has the eSIM stuffed and one doesn't.
> >  There is a single shared device tree for the two.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional skus for sc7180 pazquel360
>       commit: 185d192d0a7b565a24b3f7456a2f84f169ab087a
> [2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add sc7180-pazquel360
>       commit: 2f72a4f54cdb4fd0ebea9a2dea65756d3e676be2

FWIW, it looks like you landed v3 instead of v5. See:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220923083657.v5.3.Iea2d2918adfff2825b87d428b5732717425c196f@changeid/

Presumably something about your process got confused because Yunlong
changed the email address they were sending it from (I think someone
requested not to use an "corp-partner" email address).

The other difference between v3 and v5 is the touchscreen. Presumably
Yunlong can send a followup patch to add the touchscreen atop what
you've landed.

-Doug