Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:32:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:31:54 -0500 Received: from alfik.ms.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.19.71]:52741 "EHLO alfik.ms.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:31:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:18:24 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue Message-ID: <20011205231824.A5284@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > believe me, there was no 'grand plan'. Initially (5 years ago) Linus said > that SMP does not matter much at the moment, and that nothing should be > done in SMP space that hurts uniprocessors. Today it's exactly the other > way around. I hope uniprocessors still matter... SMP is nice, but 90% machines are still uniprocessors... [Or someone get me SMP ;)] Pavel -- "I do not steal MS software. It is not worth it." -- Pavel Kankovsky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/