Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763695AbXHAMLa (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:11:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760814AbXHAMLV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:11:21 -0400 Received: from twin.jikos.cz ([213.151.79.26]:50701 "EHLO twin.jikos.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758283AbXHAMLU (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:11:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:11:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Chr cc: linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Cleaning up the USBHID's blacklist. In-Reply-To: <200707312324.06116.chunkeey@web.de> Message-ID: References: <200707240228.39421.chunkeey@web.de> <200707301611.08758.chunkeey@web.de> <200707312324.06116.chunkeey@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 755 Lines: 19 On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chr wrote: > But I have one (final?) question. Since I am sometimes stuck to 80x25 > console... > can we alphabetically sort the blacklist by the Vendor (the first > field), instead of the quirk field(last field)? Or is there a > technical/theoretical reason behind it? I find the blacklist sorted by quirk type more convenient - we typically want to know "who has this particular quirk", but we generally don't care "what quirks does this particular vendor have". -- Jiri Kosina - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/