Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765248AbXHAMfR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:35:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763788AbXHAMfF (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:35:05 -0400 Received: from neon.samage.net ([85.17.153.66]:33463 "EHLO neon.samage.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762233AbXHAMfE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:35:04 -0400 Message-ID: <46470.81.207.0.53.1185971693.squirrel@secure.samage.net> In-Reply-To: <46B06815.10200@gmail.com> References: <1185827130.26459.16.camel@xtower.fri> <6bffcb0e0707301549t6be3cd97y27726f5421bb7680@mail.gmail.com> <20070801064816.GC10134@elte.hu> <46B06815.10200@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:34:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Linux Kernel cfs scheduler and xorg kbd From: "Indan Zupancic" To: "Rene Herman" Cc: "Andi Kleen" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Michal Piotrowski" , "CK Mailinglist" , teresa@kvitka.net, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Score: -1.8 X-Scan-Signature: a350ae07b5350cdad28cef237d2e7179 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 35 On Wed, August 1, 2007 13:01, Rene Herman wrote: > On 08/01/2007 01:31 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar writes: > >>> another reaction below in this thread reported kbd problems in vanilla >>> 2.6.22.1 as well. What is the X versions, etc.? Does the problem go away >>> if the X kbd driver selection is tweaked to a simpler model, say: >> >> Or perhaps just test with CFS reverted? It really sounds more like something >> independent from the scheduler. Perhaps someone could put a CFS-revert-for-testing patch >> on ftp somewhere. It's only a few git changesets so shouldn't be too difficult to >> do. > > Teresa was already using 2.6.22.1, with CFS (v19.1) patched in, so reverting > that would be a matter of patching it out again. She said she wasn't seeing > trouble on other kernels though. > > I was the one who also saw keyboard trouble on 2.6.22.1 without CFS by the > way -- and haven't (yet) seen any anymore since patching _in_ CFS v19.1... Could the people who had or have keyboard problems try out Dmitry's input locking patches, and see if those help: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/24/17 And if it does, report it to him, either there or here after CCing him. Greetings, Indan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/