Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221022070612.13009-1-tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com> <Y1OdSYH45MNbp03k@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y1OdSYH45MNbp03k@kroah.com>
From:   Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:22:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHJEyKXYtMiUusyq8427SjJo5VFO09O6HH0kkBYsmYzx8BMeAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] a series of checkpatch fixes on the file: rxtx.c
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 9:15 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 07:06:06AM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> > The fixes are similar, mostly long lines splitting. I had to make
> > serveral patches to ease the work of inspectors
> >
> > v2: fixed a compilation error found by the kernel test robot and
> > recompiled the code
> >
> > v3: tends out the error persisted in the second version. this version is
> > a correction of that
> >
> > Tanjuate Brunostar (6):
> >   staging: vt6655: fix lines ending in a '('
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uGetRTSCTSDuration
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_uFillDataHead
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in s_vGenerateTxParameter
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor long lines of code in the rest of the file
> >   staging: vt6655: refactor code to avoid a line ending in '('
> >
> >  drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 532 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 321 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
> Any reason you do not have "staging: vt6655:" as the prefix for this 0/X
> email subject line?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

oh I forgot to include it