Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765314AbXHAOhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:37:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763886AbXHAOhT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:37:19 -0400 Received: from jericho.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.124]:19277 "EHLO jericho.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764087AbXHAOhS (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: <46B09A92.9090409@suse.de> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:37:06 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avi Kivity CC: NeilBrown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support for stacked devices. References: <20070731112539.22428.patches@notabene> <46AF5534.3010902@argo.co.il> In-Reply-To: <46AF5534.3010902@argo.co.il> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2032 Lines: 49 Avi Kivity wrote: > NeilBrown wrote: >> To achieve this, the "for_each" macros are now somewhat more complex. >> For example, rq_for_each_segment is: >> >> #define bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, _i, offs, _size) \ >> for (_i.i = 0, _i.offset = (bio)->bi_offset + offs, \ >> _i.size = min_t(int, _size, (bio)->bi_size - offs); \ >> _i.i < (bio)->bi_vcnt && _i.size > 0; \ >> _i.i++) \ >> if (bv = *bio_iovec_idx((bio), _i.i), \ >> bv.bv_offset += _i.offset, \ >> bv.bv_len <= _i.offset \ >> ? (_i.offset -= bv.bv_len, 0) \ >> : (bv.bv_len -= _i.offset, \ >> _i.offset = 0, \ >> bv.bv_len < _i.size \ >> ? (_i.size -= bv.bv_len, 1) \ >> : (bv.bv_len = _i.size, \ >> _i.size = 0, \ >> bv.bv_len > 0))) >> >> #define bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, __i) \ >> bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, __i, 0, (bio)->bi_size) >> >> It does some with some explanatory text in a comment, but it is still >> a bit daunting. Any suggestions on making this more approachable >> would be very welcome. >> >> > > Well, I hesitate to state the obvious, but how about: > > #define bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, _i, offs, _size) \ > for (bio_iterator_init(&_i, ...); bio_iterator_cont(&_i, ...); > bio_iterator_advance(&_i, ...)) \ > if (bio_iterator_want_segment(&_i, ...)) > > While this doesn't remove the complexity, at least it's readable. Violently seconded. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/