Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp4265803rwi; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 07:30:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM592UFLIFQk4MYJTxhwm4jrvwDFYC/bbmah0k59nBAcb7Asr8MApoYyytU5Fj50iuXoNM6k X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:268a:b0:45c:c38d:ed70 with SMTP id w10-20020a056402268a00b0045cc38ded70mr22386231edd.62.1666449040795; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 07:30:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666449040; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cW5s2MWbNHMD8thaeRI0Jn93FMXr2KyADEgfgBs4jzcbKvV3Fwb9g0b/AKb2zEJrJb Tvb9Toyax1RksawskSBI87VjrQv0HpOdlpScjGiAU2ne3CbrbfsjfLDAFEedkITQgz0D uUffMAorY40q9+KfwQQDduKoaTodbWmtaRdIR0WNYtT69vlHAuMsINjJeGxh7sFtsFLA RAzB0rZrJHmGJnISpKg5l7s4i9wmLXsA/Qp1nGUhH5MHKUC57MSf8AF4xfpHGiW2O5iF qEDbkayA+41pRclhX+c9AW6G8djlBsa0qlslusdKTI/OzQRnZa/rhakbV4/4ZCVpCXBb 7Xtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=9NKJPhRSkJLOsySyGlti0UFPq+h3LBIVs/9Y7L6pDNg=; b=xVRAfeZHghSQdHTrfyU04vW6Te2PPeqK/5iSJd4so3bkpdP3996pllrD9s9fCDla+G nqCzbQLve/3XFDiXvfmzzwyZK2cIDQd3C5s68Ata/u6S/3JfLHaiw9YU2uTD+WzNlKmj ilKhup8P6sObGkw4fKGx8YDEdEHv3Bg7vwvwSCLF3esLHvHrNIl2Wn1rxs6qGp0v+Rt9 BqX+DgpKYr5S9ncrQy8FMEfP4twtJeKnFPCtPp2XL/YKOTnGRc/Bj+EQXsh6mWffxhNI TohaC2bInmw2scRmraZdt0rM/jYEJmrWHNFpoh9mFJU+xvLPIyzAWhLE8BM5gRlYUT4b xhSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=DG+SDWMJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t4-20020a508d44000000b004574154f09asi21731036edt.529.2022.10.22.07.29.56; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 07:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=DG+SDWMJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229763AbiJVNeY (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:34:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229727AbiJVNeU (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:34:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A8824FED3; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id az22-20020a05600c601600b003c6b72797fdso3784435wmb.5; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:34:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9NKJPhRSkJLOsySyGlti0UFPq+h3LBIVs/9Y7L6pDNg=; b=DG+SDWMJJFwrjmEhOjCKxThHTEAbDnI+fqIqkMkwKUYMhM32dGfqZLSG3OlpCxNyw3 S0MGvguJSykiUy/LO7Qt552E3y5vzn1gsu1lJFQ9zSVhmMcYfmT0ZMjo5/dbyRsz913/ fFLdUBzxD84E/JqTYnWuzx6DoUGt6EiOtZqHuqJHmq07j0HxShLsril8c+6Mo4/mSMzC dOGFmrFvyrdZ4/dXvJoz1HeHN+itfGXQtdgMoD/QOfE9zMBo7xW2sY6RMsJnCtDHhr4S QcFPiqVYV+FAAHrBS7HFhGxQ6bb6n9/zSLBmZyfsxz7eX9NVKEIi6yIKHRU3cyJtIZ+g 1qYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9NKJPhRSkJLOsySyGlti0UFPq+h3LBIVs/9Y7L6pDNg=; b=JxsmDujhyvmsQ0bFu5cbgkB0TSKHkE8ExEM49ds05fmVupACoiwzOOPJ5xwgXgK6Jd +659Byf5OJZ21sK56GMuO0VzBcmhLyBKRSLbDw7ZFnkCjmBOXMvEYQI+6nzm7+B9BMOt NtOY5/dSi3kgilWSeHFkot/qTJJ0o7x3jy0aFFfPYYkigXdCrgsgEKW8kZcd08nN5eJJ g04vqcFd4yDY59867TXPWOGGyBWVQ7e5w/5wOoRzPSBHnntrdIY7jCq8bytRIBQf9AWE 1S/XQzrr8ngTElSgVzpPFJnngn6l4sQkzbySDzF3v9bONo4ucallRDh2nC7PeW8VXeKv h/xw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0E1Ka6BKB1dF9Qi9VHeg6m7+VyimtAcR9a7G60Vs8m+2+xvzds SXrEWNH1y+4uN/MS+BJua8k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5cc:b0:3c6:674d:7138 with SMTP id p12-20020a05600c05cc00b003c6674d7138mr16173704wmd.176.1666445654421; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debby ([2a01:e0a:a6d:a8d0:7ff4:8f61:5574:9f95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k16-20020a5d6290000000b0022ae4f8395dsm20765771wru.96.2022.10.22.06.34.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:34:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Romain Perier To: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Palmer , Romain Perier Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau Subject: [PATCH v7 1/1] clk: mstar: msc313 cpupll clk driver Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:34:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20221022133404.3832-2-romain.perier@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20221022133404.3832-1-romain.perier@gmail.com> References: <20221022133404.3832-1-romain.perier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Palmer Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present in MStar SoCs. Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible this driver isn't entirely correct. Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar ARMv7 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer Co-developed-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Romain Perier --- drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile | 1 + drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig index de37e1bce2d2..b9bcb5e02814 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Kconfig @@ -1,4 +1,11 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +config MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL + bool "MStar CPUPLL driver" + depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST + default ARCH_MSTARV7 + help + Support for the CPU PLL present on MStar/Sigmastar SoCs. + config MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL bool "MStar MPLL driver" depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile index f8dcd25ede1d..17d97eedcd36 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/Makefile @@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ # Makefile for mstar specific clk # +obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_CPUPLL) += clk-msc313-cpupll.o obj-$(CONFIG_MSTAR_MSC313_MPLL) += clk-msc313-mpll.o diff --git a/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a93e2dba09d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/mstar/clk-msc313-cpupll.c @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2019 Daniel Palmer + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* + * This IP is not documented outside of the messy vendor driver. + * Below is what we think the registers look like based on looking at + * the vendor code and poking at the hardware: + * + * 0x140 -- LPF low. Seems to store one half of the clock transition + * 0x144 / + * 0x148 -- LPF high. Seems to store one half of the clock transition + * 0x14c / + * 0x150 -- vendor code says "toggle lpf enable" + * 0x154 -- mu? + * 0x15c -- lpf_update_count? + * 0x160 -- vendor code says "switch to LPF". Clock source config? Register bank? + * 0x164 -- vendor code says "from low to high" which seems to mean transition from LPF low to + * LPF high. + * 0x174 -- Seems to be the PLL lock status bit + * 0x180 -- Seems to be the current frequency, this might need to be populated by software? + * 0x184 / The vendor driver uses these to set the initial value of LPF low + * + * Frequency seems to be calculated like this: + * (parent clock (432mhz) / register_magic_value) * 16 * 524288 + * Only the lower 24 bits of the resulting value will be used. In addition, the + * PLL doesn't seem to be able to lock on frequencies lower than 220 MHz, as + * divisor 0xfb586f (220 MHz) works but 0xfb7fff locks up. + * + * Vendor values: + * frequency - register value + * + * 400000000 - 0x0067AE14 + * 600000000 - 0x00451EB8, + * 800000000 - 0x0033D70A, + * 1000000000 - 0x002978d4, + */ + +#define REG_LPF_LOW_L 0x140 +#define REG_LPF_LOW_H 0x144 +#define REG_LPF_HIGH_BOTTOM 0x148 +#define REG_LPF_HIGH_TOP 0x14c +#define REG_LPF_TOGGLE 0x150 +#define REG_LPF_MYSTERYTWO 0x154 +#define REG_LPF_UPDATE_COUNT 0x15c +#define REG_LPF_MYSTERYONE 0x160 +#define REG_LPF_TRANSITIONCTRL 0x164 +#define REG_LPF_LOCK 0x174 +#define REG_CURRENT 0x180 + +#define LPF_LOCK_TIMEOUT 100000000 + +#define MULTIPLIER_1 16 +#define MULTIPLIER_2 524288 +#define MULTIPLIER (MULTIPLIER_1 * MULTIPLIER_2) + +struct msc313_cpupll { + void __iomem *base; + struct clk_hw clk_hw; +}; + +#define to_cpupll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct msc313_cpupll, clk_hw) + +static u32 msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, unsigned int reg) +{ + u32 value; + + value = ioread16(cpupll->base + reg + 4) << 16; + value |= ioread16(cpupll->base + reg); + + return value; +} + +static void msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, unsigned int reg, u32 value) +{ + u16 l = value & 0xffff, h = (value >> 16) & 0xffff; + + iowrite16(l, cpupll->base + reg); + iowrite16(h, cpupll->base + reg + 4); +} + +static void msc313_cpupll_setfreq(struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll, u32 regvalue) +{ + ktime_t timeout; + + msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_HIGH_BOTTOM, regvalue); + + iowrite16(0x1, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_MYSTERYONE); + iowrite16(0x6, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_MYSTERYTWO); + iowrite16(0x8, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_UPDATE_COUNT); + iowrite16(BIT(12), cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TRANSITIONCTRL); + + iowrite16(0, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE); + iowrite16(1, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE); + + timeout = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), LPF_LOCK_TIMEOUT); + while (!(ioread16(cpupll->base + REG_LPF_LOCK))) { + if (ktime_after(ktime_get(), timeout)) { + pr_err("timeout waiting for LPF_LOCK\n"); + return; + } + cpu_relax(); + } + + iowrite16(0, cpupll->base + REG_LPF_TOGGLE); + + msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L, regvalue); +} + +static unsigned long msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(u32 reg, unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + unsigned long long prescaled = ((unsigned long long)parent_rate) * MULTIPLIER; + + if (prescaled == 0 || reg == 0) + return 0; + return DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(prescaled, reg); +} + +static u32 msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + unsigned long long prescaled = ((unsigned long long)parent_rate) * MULTIPLIER; + + if (prescaled == 0 || rate == 0) + return 0; + return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(prescaled, rate); +} + +static unsigned long msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll = to_cpupll(hw); + + return msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L), + parent_rate); +} + +static long msc313_cpupll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long *parent_rate) +{ + u32 reg = msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(rate, *parent_rate); + long rounded = msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(reg, *parent_rate); + + /* + * This is my poor attempt at making sure the resulting + * rate doesn't overshoot the requested rate. + */ + for (; rounded >= rate && reg > 0; reg--) + rounded = msc313_cpupll_frequencyforreg(reg, *parent_rate); + + return rounded; +} + +static int msc313_cpupll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll = to_cpupll(hw); + u32 reg = msc313_cpupll_regforfrequecy(rate, parent_rate); + + msc313_cpupll_setfreq(cpupll, reg); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct clk_ops msc313_cpupll_ops = { + .recalc_rate = msc313_cpupll_recalc_rate, + .round_rate = msc313_cpupll_round_rate, + .set_rate = msc313_cpupll_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id msc313_cpupll_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "mstar,msc313-cpupll" }, + {} +}; + +static int msc313_cpupll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct clk_init_data clk_init = {}; + struct clk_parent_data cpupll_parent = { .index = 0 }; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct msc313_cpupll *cpupll; + int ret; + + cpupll = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cpupll), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cpupll) + return -ENOMEM; + + cpupll->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(cpupll->base)) + return PTR_ERR(cpupll->base); + + /* LPF might not contain the current frequency so fix that up */ + msc313_cpupll_reg_write32(cpupll, REG_LPF_LOW_L, + msc313_cpupll_reg_read32(cpupll, REG_CURRENT)); + + clk_init.name = dev_name(dev); + clk_init.ops = &msc313_cpupll_ops; + clk_init.parent_data = &cpupll_parent; + clk_init.num_parents = 1; + cpupll->clk_hw.init = &clk_init; + + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &cpupll->clk_hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(&pdev->dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &cpupll->clk_hw); +} + +static struct platform_driver msc313_cpupll_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "mstar-msc313-cpupll", + .of_match_table = msc313_cpupll_of_match, + }, + .probe = msc313_cpupll_probe, +}; +builtin_platform_driver(msc313_cpupll_driver); -- 2.35.1