Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp4526720rwi; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:30:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7czhb0Qya3QEQct+PBvsvBnpozpVb9CiYxN8cGeyMC2brnb7u89Ye9fe5Kt0TdGQyDWXTE X-Received: by 2002:a63:cf48:0:b0:439:7d1c:fedc with SMTP id b8-20020a63cf48000000b004397d1cfedcmr21711787pgj.281.1666463451999; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:30:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666463451; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yJAU+ajusvmIi1G6vdmvgA+5RYsdSNMGn47/tp+hkRq65LXd5KtT3SKnG9Vbpv5T+c yejMJTwYPJ5Z9V/Avs8vc7CrH61kqH0Y/e5twOABKKT6UoKYBT4BPnene2XLp1AXLO3w m4Wx6qFCRPj/MzuZOFn8dowMp/NXaQrpHmxG/WOgXdJCLPEOlwqsOWMUY+OO0o3jala6 OHy5+NfMY8eDtUeBKWnFAxCSsmf9V1wlUkmQ0BOLLeMRZRZVqtNnIh4TmI8UziSsEBG3 Y7txM3W0TzrrBxzt7tDm1tfmumKgn0Atjsmdz7v3iwqkiXlgFlhHggCuJ3xVo+TReH8H BE0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=PbMp9nRV4Rb1lNBp4ackx21snQ7p1o3AwWoBrCj3z4o=; b=hvFm5FqvxzYa6aE+FqTNR2IpRoAcJeI3/IgPrfLCxiAGsEZ6dZ/clpR2/h4B1Fli8V GYC6hvC4JroEbJtYWhDitg3yHT0VA+l7tYYdM9GArHZZ0Nq8trt57PcJi629KpJSMCCd CqrqKuoetJ09OBz/IScthTv4pnVwbyzObRByHR8rssFUhHqp4nQc4q8M6WFQtG60jO1a s/1TC6Mv6j22t7Lolmn57JF4RHHm2X+pJRsPFAoipIk8Bh8ZPHnAgFrTxHaafPHTmONA CoMMEHkvQOEWUJd7WvWwxxzX2L/LxLtolcixcjlZBdcGkQceRLQi4qSyZK/ea7GJa6f8 BtEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=YEvmspKk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cp8-20020a056a00348800b00565de49c23dsi25123892pfb.105.2022.10.22.11.30.39; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=YEvmspKk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229867AbiJVRzm (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:55:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50794 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229663AbiJVRzh (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:55:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463B4625D8 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id z8so3523614qtv.5 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PbMp9nRV4Rb1lNBp4ackx21snQ7p1o3AwWoBrCj3z4o=; b=YEvmspKkGkWBhn47N+fWxLUtC3jfzU4GqR7K00ks1EDc2cklpxvqvo0QWLjKAXbKRr z4iR+l75jIZEi+o+Dd0yB0w7OadiYkedJGd245WsA1+U9lWmMVvXf/KgKLcqV1dWYl7d Qcyxzs/vKjVZEuc/FwHAQYErTqXn7/0sE6WsA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PbMp9nRV4Rb1lNBp4ackx21snQ7p1o3AwWoBrCj3z4o=; b=jXZ/V35BgC/83Zxa+FQcgQnUzE4lGs2j5m0NQftOhi2vhny9oMCHzwtNXagGjRz243 ffRsL6caqHhaVnhQIzbsLZuNDYyUTInK4eY98Wo6i+IRRNUMJqE9aM4+ei6bIvlABaEV 1zLf65w5nl1A6wA0qS4CGz0PXeroTUu6MhV9th5Oai5yLbOXogCWkKwW1Ii72Pw6B/fA uDFaKRd2XmQEUq1Yzh5yxte2E17jGC6uptYKmZMtqjaHggt1jocRI4/VGqAl/fgVAmnM 4iiZ15BByVWfZDB9F8x+bivuyOFWJbxN9CUlhspgWmd6rvQmwOj5aJg4qw/3giFsV5nE phAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2dnUK/EvpETfPYl+aFnb/aHNFc7Ha52j0DJ4HhpEIm+3EfouRk 3PZN3Tpox3LTdG2ay1K+L33bdcbrzOtiNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1aa0:b0:39c:ce01:8764 with SMTP id s32-20020a05622a1aa000b0039cce018764mr22061884qtc.401.1666461335072; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com. [209.85.128.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bq12-20020a05620a468c00b006ee957439f2sm11524672qkb.133.2022.10.22.10.55.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-35befab86a4so51654927b3.8 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a81:1902:0:b0:36b:2578:f6e2 with SMTP id 2-20020a811902000000b0036b2578f6e2mr3138851ywz.352.1666461334165; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221022111403.531902164@infradead.org> <20221022114425.168036718@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20221022114425.168036718@infradead.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:55:18 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] x86_64: Remove pointless set_64bit() usage To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, aarcange@redhat.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, jroedel@suse.de, ubizjak@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 4:48 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The use of set_64bit() in X86_64 only code is pretty pointless, seeing > how it's a direct assignment. Remove all this nonsense. Thanks. That was really confusing code, using set_64bit() in exactly the situation where it was _not_ needed. Linus