Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <07B628ED6CABEF1D+932737cc-7d4b-4071-531e-82f88d89a872@linux.starfivetech.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:11:41 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 15/30] clk: starfive: Use regmap APIs to operate
 registers
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220929143225.17907-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com>
 <20220929175602.19946-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com>
 <20220930214824.A14ACC433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
 <CAJM55Z8xxrKqaN64KAP9miTis4wFbL2S9uhV5h-SOiYjbYng+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221012230525.C6E58C433D7@smtp.kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Hal Feng <hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221012230525.C6E58C433D7@smtp.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:linux.starfivetech.com:qybglogicsvr:qybglogicsvr2
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:05:23 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Emil Renner Berthing (2022-10-05 06:14:44)
> > > > @@ -295,11 +296,13 @@ static int __init clk_starfive_jh7100_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >         if (!priv)
> > > >                 return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > -       spin_lock_init(&priv->rmw_lock);
> > > >         priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > -       priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > > > -       if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > > > -               return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> > > > +       priv->regmap = device_node_to_regmap(priv->dev->of_node);
> > >
> > > This is sad. Why do we need to make a syscon? Can we instead use the
> > > auxiliary bus to make a reset device that either gets a regmap made here
> > > in this driver or uses a void __iomem * mapped with ioremap
> > > (priv->base)?
> > 
> > In my original code the clock driver just registers the resets too
> > similar to other combined clock and reset drivers. I wonder what you
> > think about that approach:
> > https://github.com/esmil/linux/commit/36f15e1b827b02d7f493dc5fce31060b21976e68
> > and
> > https://github.com/esmil/linux/commit/4ccafadb72968480aa3dd28c227fcccae411c13b#diff-ffec81f902f810cb210012c25e8d88217ea5b4021419a4206d1fd4dd19edfce8R471
> 
> I think we should use auxiliary bus and split the driver logically into
> a reset driver in drivers/reset and a clk driver in drivers/clk. That
> way the appropriate maintainers can review the code. There is only one
> platform device with a single reg property and node in DT, but there are
> two drivers. 

Yes, I agree that the reset driver and the clock driver should be split.
However, I think using auxiliary bus is a little bit complicated in this
case, because the reset is not a part of functionality of the clock in 
JH7110. They just share a common register base address. I think it is 
better to use ioremap for the same address, and the dt will be like

syscrg_clk: clock-controller@13020000 {
	compatible = "starfive,jh7110-clkgen-sys";
	reg = <0x0 0x13020000 0x0 0x10000>;
	...
};
syscrg_rst: reset-controller@13020000 {
	compatible = "starfive,jh7110-reset-sys";
	reg = <0x0 0x13020000 0x0 0x10000>;
	...
};

What do you think of this approach? I would appreciate your suggestions.

Best regards,
Hal