Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:32:02 +0200
From:   netdev@kapio-technology.com
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@gmail.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
        Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@wifirst.fr>,
        Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@gmail.com>,
        Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@gmail.com>,
        Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry
 flag
In-Reply-To: <Y1FHuXE+X/V9aRvh@shredder>
References: <20221018165619.134535-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221018165619.134535-3-netdev@kapio-technology.com>
 <Y1FHuXE+X/V9aRvh@shredder>
User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail
Message-ID: <7690b7f836b144b60f60b3b68d3bf784@kapio-technology.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-10-20 15:06, Ido Schimmel wrote:

> [...]
> 
>> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, 
>> struct net_bridge *br,
>>  		err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true);
>>  	} else {
>>  		spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
>> -		err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb);
>> +		err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags, 
>> nfea_tb);
> 
> I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible.

Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel 
itself and it did not
give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready 
for submission'.

As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something 
to do with perl?