Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765055AbXHATmA (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:42:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761632AbXHATlw (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:41:52 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36769 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753538AbXHATlv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:41:51 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: pm_trace displays the wrong time from the RTC Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:50:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux-kernel References: <46AFA78A.9010904@redhat.com> <200708011747.37932.rjw@sisk.pl> <46B0CDB3.8060505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <46B0CDB3.8060505@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708012150.32715.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1756 Lines: 52 On Wednesday, 1 August 2007 20:15, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 08/01/2007 11:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Sorry for slow response, I've just noticed this thread. > > > > On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:20, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> When resuming, systems print this when booted on 07/31/07: > >> > >> Date: 06/31/107 > >> > >> /drivers/base/power/trace.c::read_magic_time(): > >> 114 get_rtc_time(&time); > >> 115 printk("Time: %2d:%02d:%02d Date: %02d/%02d/%02d\n", > >> 116 time.tm_hour, time.tm_min, time.tm_sec, > >> 117 time.tm_mon, time.tm_mday, time.tm_year); > >> > >> include/asm-generic/rtc.h: > >> 102 /* > >> 103 * Account for differences between how the RTC uses the values > >> 104 * and how they are defined in a struct rtc_time; > >> 105 */ > >> 106 if (time->tm_year <= 69) > >> 107 time->tm_year += 100; > >> 108 > >> 109 time->tm_mon--; > > > > Do you mean that systems display bad date after resuming if PM_TRACE is set, > > even if /sys/power/pm_trace contains 1 ? > > > > If that's the case, are they i386 or x86_64? > > > > i386: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250238 OK, I now see what you mean. On my x86_64 test box this also happens after a fresh boot without suspending/resuming, so I think the problem is that we just shouldn't add 100 to the year and decrease the month in get_rtc_time(). Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/