Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:18:08 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= <kabel@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Get rid of
 devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
Message-ID: <Y1aCgJihNIqExUR2@google.com>
References: <20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-v1-0-1e47125df20f@gmail.com>
 <YyzYKmsjKflqT1xZ@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YyzYKmsjKflqT1xZ@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Pavel, Marek,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > This drops the last uses of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> > from the tree and drops the stubs implementing this API on top of
> > devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index().
> > 
> > Note that the bulk of users were converted in 2019, the couple of LED
> > drivers are all that have remained.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Dmitry Torokhov (3):
> >       leds: gpio: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> >       leds: lgm-sso: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> >       gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> > 
> >  drivers/leds/blink/leds-lgm-sso.c |  5 ++---
> >  drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c          |  5 ++---
> >  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h     | 21 ---------------------
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 7fd22855300e693668c3397771b3a2b3948f827a
> > change-id: 20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-a62638849e91
> > 
> 
> Could you please consider picking this up for 6.1? Or would you be OK
> with this going through other tree (GPIO maybe)?

*ping* Could this go through GPIO tree? Dropping this API helps with
some outstanding work that I have...

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry