Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:11:54 +0300
From:   Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
To:     Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Cc:     mdf@kernel.org, hao.wu@intel.com, trix@redhat.com, dg@emlix.com,
        j.zink@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@pengutronix.de, system@metrotek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 1/2] fpga: lattice-sysconfig-spi: add Lattice
 sysCONFIG FPGA manager
Message-ID: <20221025111154.d4o6hvya2fb6hmev@h-e2.ddg>
References: <20221025053947.2737-1-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
 <20221025053947.2737-2-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
 <Y1eILk6ArO5OVzwW@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y1eILk6ArO5OVzwW@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 02:54:38PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On 2022-10-25 at 08:39:46 +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> > Add support to the FPGA manager for programming Lattice ECP5 FPGA over
> > slave SPI sysCONFIG interface.
> > 
> > sysCONFIG interface core functionality is separate from both ECP5 and
> > SPI specifics, so support for other FPGAs with different port types can
> > be added in the future.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static int sysconfig_spi_bitstream_burst_init(struct sysconfig_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > +	const u8 lsc_bitstream_burst[] = SYSCONFIG_LSC_BITSTREAM_BURST;
> > +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(priv->dev);
> > +	struct spi_transfer xfer = {};
> > +	struct spi_message msg;
> > +	size_t buf_len;
> > +	void *buf;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	buf_len = sizeof(lsc_bitstream_burst);
> > +
> > +	buf = kmemdup(lsc_bitstream_burst, buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!buf)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +
> 
> I removed the second blank line and applied this series to for-next.
> 

Sorry for this negligence. Thanks.