Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp8346930rwi; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:44:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5khFLhBkWuHp9Y/3mRDVPi4MhlTDP9gzdhP01sIG5vpID4Le2Y43dIWZBTnDnMc6kS5xuB X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3d91:b0:78d:f675:5659 with SMTP id he17-20020a1709073d9100b0078df6755659mr31637804ejc.92.1666701854003; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:44:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666701853; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=khHCNgiPkhF6ITNaE92TRFegSf3mzzPGgZIs3RNxH/dj8EGJk8DjQJYiA/HPkZXudI TdIWW9WB3SOL3ihw2vRmYpKPlb/w+ArXYJOARd1HiGE1ERQqjsgE64WZ8ueLNNtY4f46 BatDHYMh1H9CnxMI6sofOqmmUnIsawvdp0Eh+v21+LSFlS8srRscbXB2+bpNiqq6XThm xZzjhBBWeqFQ2mag9JvdFfqzl8o6kyK4GdRgFwrGAdNzisE/98Q945LzoonaBmvZjTul 26DYg19RDra7APg2uf3g36jCCAReXPzitjG0Qu0LQa1dmH+3ZUQ/MdM4hvwa++6YZWst 36Ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=UYUaukjgG6ZPIhZG6+5xi4ihALsr7hi5S92eDWaX9Js=; b=AS0tolrEDpbl8p4PLRK2XdSCv4FGh0+yQWD/aE4oBz4ULxjV6oqYCsCKfL1qGVsmkG FkGGvVta6KMe3WDSPbIVtmCgZTpv0TeVqNVnoaNk5/hD+TvUv8VflPsxYUuvZEwmBtuY y8Rrs9Qy3AlnpAs4tkpHNIRgrKb03V9u624LJ2DPsA+l4ePv54DO7LRHwEDD7ur+IKFB 8dqo6QsKvMetgfareHZzwNqcerP3RTY4FQ9rMECDp2VsIAUbRPE4iNw5kFRSqAh/KetC Uvqmm31Z0Liw7BCqzvIV8ulWSh3dtwin+DEFDgTgNCFaXe0JNZnWeGiKZSppKDAeceOt Madw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="LPbQLK3/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6-20020a056402428600b0045903f0af9dsi2715263edc.111.2022.10.25.05.43.48; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="LPbQLK3/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231958AbiJYMiM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:38:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56982 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231921AbiJYMiK (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:38:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AAB188A9D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id z5-20020a17090a8b8500b00210a3a2364fso1436968pjn.0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UYUaukjgG6ZPIhZG6+5xi4ihALsr7hi5S92eDWaX9Js=; b=LPbQLK3/YEUNHpbsljFlrrNkHOjHg+b2Dl5khLYRIbkIc2Ok43F9bS7v9pNBFXrOvv phAIH/D60w4A/LMnQeL0X2hKEfTNDJzuv4KVe4V1nRRguqPe5/WvrDQRgGGf1MPYpQFX enIRpGTAZ3QI/yhZN2q44OAv6xXh726SC6qEc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UYUaukjgG6ZPIhZG6+5xi4ihALsr7hi5S92eDWaX9Js=; b=UxblsVERkb99obC/u8Zp8G17eMWyNE60VmdMsAJUnypo5oSXlEoaa5bs2pgdZfrrBh AdqJ/PTecxRFKPk0+sLX9Bp6oK7DcUb8Zhuz/+qcmJ6BPlEK8cizi7S/o9kzie5yz1zb eFpWFwL2sKCEaZT/ALa/SmMSQNaXXELwYNk1Qw0ogpiK97EN4jwAsqToI8I0BxZpu5ez bFdEEC7aAgRLjOohx8dVo7tYi1wT6qRyoG4v6SDjX1a+VYBDHZmu0KxWFJzhzdA/RYRZ ia5aul8mYGVlOYVSVH+ugWOY4MLU83xI8wG+LdrwfLoLhmZwMb9t5Qp2sL1Ys+VWffOe ezUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0nF92QkwbGkQ8sECUsuH5akMhKf8vKBZJF3CcuY456PUxSX56G z591go/lXSdO2qBVoUuwptzqtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0c:b0:20f:bcbf:ab5 with SMTP id pg12-20020a17090b1e0c00b0020fbcbf0ab5mr42924589pjb.187.1666701489563; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([240f:75:7537:3187:c493:65a6:2d64:1325]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13-20020a170902e74d00b0017a018221e2sm1177082plf.70.2022.10.25.05.38.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:38:04 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Aleksey Romanov Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , "minchan@kernel.org" , "ngupta@vflare.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] zram: add size class equals check into recompression Message-ID: References: <20221024120942.13885-1-avromanov@sberdevices.ru> <20221025094859.7kbcqknlkmo4hj2y@cab-wsm-0029881.lan> <20221025115542.5o4igroslirn6cxy@cab-wsm-0029881.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221025115542.5o4igroslirn6cxy@cab-wsm-0029881.lan> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (22/10/25 11:55), Aleksey Romanov wrote: > > Return: the index of the zsmalloc &size_class that hold objects of the > > provided size. > > > > unsigned int zs_lookup_class_index(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned int size) > > { > > struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)]; > > > > return class->index; > > } > > Sure. I think it would be more logical, and perhaps such a function > would be more applicable in other cases, in the future. > > Will you fix it in your cherry-pick? For that I probably will ask you to send out v2, if possible.