Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:10:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:10:00 -0500 Received: from mail311.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.171]:40843 "EHLO imf11bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:09:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3C0F27CA.59C22DEF@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 03:09:46 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Owens CC: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions In-Reply-To: <11777.1007619756@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This patch against 2.4.16 defines __devexit_p() for pointers to > functions defined as __devexit, the wrapper inserts the function name > or NULL, based on config options. It allows people to use the new > binutils on the kernel, there are some real kernel bugs that binutils > will find once this patch is in. > > I have patched all the obvious references to __devexit functions, > leaving a few which appear to be real bugs. I notified the maintainers > of the buggy code privately. Why not __attribute__((weak)) ? -- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/