Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp573215rwi; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 05:13:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7TElOPbMVYdsagRAWCdjkneKtaH8hnpqAqH7tiFIIwd0HvegIO8mkJDfyr+2NCLSufTfMa X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f07:b0:779:7f94:d259 with SMTP id qf7-20020a1709077f0700b007797f94d259mr42010790ejc.525.1666872783399; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 05:13:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666872783; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uy7ebOIj6GsNXDo9nka97Ue73VLgf8s80oDTaVVK9gd53coJZq7Qu0B/MEuZvriD+E QGlflQx9lzpgox6ycVPXfvbMhmSf9JuqhP8o0d5dskSX2+T2UsK6kyuCfWG3zY67PdOe 8Pw7KxTZTOVJYH9MO0//20VP+T+nklr7/Jc15mPgN5Q6NqxXrW5aPMp6uQCjLUlXMAJS xz+4MIukTUmujWLuzFbRAPioxRLWDpMlP8VAnPVNY/IkyTf0NZgoi7TfiBUXGnsj53lc e0nbXCt+QSVeKid+J9TUHd1yFOm9CW2ieX3EtYoC7qzT6gdcxAPRyR856Sy7FpaDEjcJ tT+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=eNREXhFn28dAnt9RJtCqWVsAsKw/pEE5T5r+1VEs2es=; b=lmiRpU04dyBPOB2jgR2gqo/qlA5sM66WhXpwSyrNUy0sSltETrYO9J1j98ufgUDx1c vZ+aKrl8cm0JbwYIejHMoNRkdB1WO9yXNT82C6C31OxQXI0o1oEtM3NL2m/62pHoWmfw REi3Qm+dx/X+gY0Mn0iKEw4pkH9wCl2ARhZeuEpKfmtD5wlNcHRf1D7jXSI4ViXjrWHQ IplMH8L5b2DHxY8XtJgIHgSizw8onkeuN3YBfdhjPLwM6YziSuKTvvP4YKfhCpXTp0nA P5738sKBGv8Zr90Fij44CTs5KcPl5bSfqXwza8SZQ0hOWMtyNPnykkkVqrWPx3lg8GNI 6LAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Bkhn+06g; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a2-20020aa7cf02000000b00461f2136969si1448184edy.242.2022.10.27.05.12.34; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 05:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Bkhn+06g; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233960AbiJ0LK6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 07:10:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233747AbiJ0LKz (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 07:10:55 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB9FD4A2D; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 04:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57BC2242E; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:10:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1666869052; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eNREXhFn28dAnt9RJtCqWVsAsKw/pEE5T5r+1VEs2es=; b=Bkhn+06gDfkJZ1aSexpqdeCr651iD8y8lUgKDG+vCccDCnD3OUoDTKhr1xksXd8GWi4oeG y1V95m2c8EPzxspZ499tUvPrJF58MghkZ6HlrxMptbaO42zj61u1oAJiBWCjEHD8TkvmRp EtNSZm4K69XWlN7EHj00WRENV32RBT4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1666869052; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eNREXhFn28dAnt9RJtCqWVsAsKw/pEE5T5r+1VEs2es=; b=YbMco8eP0vWkzmHwMpbUsgDgPgoX8DBlo1mZSeCZuI+KF/hVvOyOxkn1rnbgg9ogRCuNfD g/C/X/w0e9BbtGCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB16A134CA; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id MpOIJjxnWmOSGgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:10:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:10:51 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Chen Zhongjin Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Fix adapter not be removed in piix4_remove() Message-ID: <20221027131051.796d6a36@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20221025024456.110090-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> References: <20221025024456.110090-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chen, On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:44:56 +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote: > In piix4_probe(), the piix4 adapter will be registered in: > > piix4_probe() > piix4_add_adapters_sb800() / piix4_add_adapter() > i2c_add_adapter() > > Based on the probed device type, piix4_add_adapters_sb800() or single > piix4_add_adapter() will be called. > For the former case, piix4_adapter_count is set as the number of adapters, > while for antoher case it is not set and kept default *zero*. > > When piix4 is removed, piix4_remove() removes the adapters added in > piix4_probe(), basing on the piix4_adapter_count value. > Because the count is zero for the single adapter case, the adapter won't > be removed and makes the sources allocated for adapter leaked, such as > the i2c client and device. > > These sources can still be accessed by i2c or bus and cause problems. > An easily reproduced case is that if a new adapter is registered, i2c > will get the leaked adapter and try to call smbus_algorithm, which was > already freed: > > Triggered by: rmmod i2c_piix4 & modprobe max31730 > > BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc053d860 > #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > CPU: 0 PID: 3752 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) > RIP: 0010:i2c_default_probe (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2259) i2c_core > RSP: 0018:ffff888107477710 EFLAGS: 00000246 > ... > > i2c_detect (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2302) i2c_core > __process_new_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1336) i2c_core > bus_for_each_dev (drivers/base/bus.c:301) > i2c_for_each_dev (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1823) i2c_core > i2c_register_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1861) i2c_core > do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1296) > do_init_module (kernel/module/main.c:2455) > ... > > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > Fix this problem by correctly set piix4_adapter_count for the single > adapter path so the adapter can be normally removed in piix4_remove(). > > Fixes: 528d53a1592b ("i2c: piix4: Fix probing of reserved ports on AMD Family 16h Model 30h") > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin Nice catch, and sorry for introducing this bug in the first place. I'm not fully happy with your fix though. > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c > index 39cb1b7bb865..125646fd36dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c > @@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ static int piix4_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > "", &piix4_main_adapters[0]); > if (retval < 0) > return retval; > + piix4_adapter_count++; > } > > /* Check for auxiliary SMBus on some AMD chipsets */ Fundamentally, you want to set piix4_adapter_count to 1. You use ++ based on the assumption that piix4_adapter_count is 0 initially. While this is true upon loading the driver, it would no longer be true is an adapter has already been registered and then unregistered without unloading the driver. This could happen if the SMBus controller is hot-plugged/unplugged (I am not aware of this happening in the real world, to be honest) or if the system owner manually unbinds then rebinds the device to the i2c-piix4 driver (something a kernel developer could legitimately do to exercise or otherwise test the probing and removal code paths of the driver). So I think that the following sequence would cause piix4_adapter_count to grow beyond PIIX4_MAX_ADAPTERS with your patch applied (adjust the PCI device bus location according to your system), which in turn would result in an array overrun in piix4_remove(): # for n in `seq 1 8` ; do echo "0000:00:14.0" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/piix4_smbus/unbind ; echo "0000:00:14.0" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/piix4_smbus/bind ; done For this reason, I am asking that you explicitly set piix4_adapter_count to 1 instead of incrementing it. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support