Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ad1d4135-031e-9393-07af-7b81c9ecffb5@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:08:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom,rpmh-rsc: Update to allow
 for generic nodes
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20221026200429.162212-1-quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
 <20221026200429.162212-2-quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221026200429.162212-2-quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote:
> Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of
> device-specific node names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
> index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties:
>      $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml#
>  
>  patternProperties:
> -  '-regulators$':
> +  'regulators$':

This should be rather fixed like:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model
names as device node names...

Best regards,
Krzysztof