Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758997AbXHCG0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2007 02:26:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754287AbXHCG0L (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2007 02:26:11 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:35614 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751638AbXHCG0K (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2007 02:26:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:25:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Keith Owens Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" , Takenori Nagano , k-miyoshi@cb.jp.nec.com, Bernhard Walle , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] add kdump_after_notifier Message-Id: <20070802232502.b93f4ea0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <31687.1186113947@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20070802112852.GA7054@in.ibm.com> <31687.1186113947@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1628 Lines: 33 On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:05:47 +1000 Keith Owens wrote: > I have pretty well given up on RAS code in the Linux kernel. Everybody > has different ideas, there is no overall plan and little interest from > Linus in getting RAS tools into the kernel. We are just thrashing. Lots of different groups, little commonality in their desired funtionality, little interest in sharing infrastructure or concepts. Sometimes people need a bit of motivational help. In this case that motivation would come from the understanding that all the RAS tools would be *required* to use such infrastructure if it was merged. Going off and open-coding your own stuff would henceforth not be acceptable. If it turns out that it really was unsuitable for a particular group's RAS feature, and we merged it anyway, well, that mismatch is that group's fault. It was a sizeable mistake to send those patches to a few obscure mailing lists - this is the first I've heard of it, for example. So. Please, send it all again, copy the correct lists and people, make sure that at least one client of the infrastructure is wired up and working (ideally, all such in-kernel clients should be wired up) and let's take a look at it. Much of the onus is upon the various RAS tool developers to demonstrate why it is unsuitable for their use and, hopefully, to explain how it can be fixed for them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/