Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0e3a0cab-1093-3e83-9e9c-f8639ebe5da0@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:49:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 00/23] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Guang Zeng <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
References: <20221025124741.228045-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221025124741.228045-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/25/22 14:47, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This patch series is a result of long debug work to find out why
> sometimes guests with win11 secure boot
> were failing during boot.
> 
> During writing a unit test I found another bug, turns out
> that on rsm emulation, if the rsm instruction was done in real
> or 32 bit mode, KVM would truncate the restored RIP to 32 bit.
> 
> I also refactored the way we write SMRAM so it is easier
> now to understand what is going on.
> 
> The main bug in this series which I fixed is that we
> allowed #SMI to happen during the STI interrupt shadow,
> and we did nothing to both reset it on #SMI handler
> entry and restore it on RSM.

I have now sent out the final/new version of the first 8 patches and 
will review these tomorrow.  Thanks for your patience. :)

Paolo