Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:35:57 +0200
From:   Nam Cao <namcaov@gmail.com>
To:     UMWARI JOVIAL <umwarijovial@gmail.com>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  Possible repeated word: 'very'
Message-ID: <20221028073557.GA42252@nam-dell>
References: <20221028070439.GA36889@rdm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221028070439.GA36889@rdm>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:04:39AM +0300, UMWARI JOVIAL wrote:
> Reported By checkpatch.pl script
> 
> WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'very'
> 
> Repetition of the same word in one sentence same line
> 
> Signed-off-by: UMWARI JOVIAL <umwarijovial@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c
> index 090345bad223..30a0276b8b58 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_xmit.c
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ void r8712_free_xmitbuf(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct xmit_buf *pxmitbuf)
>   * If we turn on USE_RXTHREAD, then, no need for critical section.
>   * Otherwise, we must use _enter/_exit critical to protect free_xmit_queue...
>   *
> - * Must be very very cautious...
> + * Must be very cautious...
>   *
>   */
>  struct xmit_frame *r8712_alloc_xmitframe(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>

This patch is an updated version of another patch you sent, so you must
use the "v2" prefix. Furthermore, you need to have to name of the
subsystem that change. So it should be something like: 
[PATCH v2] staging: rtl8712: <short description of the commit>

And I think the person who wrote that just wanted to stress it by
duplicating "very". So I don't think this patch is necessary.

Best regards,
Nam