Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 19:06:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, david@redhat.com,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        nramas@linux.microsoft.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
        robh@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, rppt@kernel.org,
        sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support
Message-ID: <Y1wL+ZrvD5gTZaKN@zn.tnic>
References: <Y0Dh4ieUUZ4oXa1/@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <Y0b9apyIs+RpSo1e@zn.tnic>
 <53aed03e-2eed-09b1-9532-fe4e497ea47d@oracle.com>
 <Y0cmaPTKQuWtwIRh@zn.tnic>
 <Y0d+mFivS+88+Chr@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <Y1e7Hw0PRDI9NxU9@zn.tnic>
 <Y1lIoTBNvHrKX5K9@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <35c98ca6-10f8-b248-78c5-99fce7e66c65@oracle.com>
 <Y1uspLb7fLdtnQq+@zn.tnic>
 <d91f8728-6a63-415d-577c-bd76e69ec7f6@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d91f8728-6a63-415d-577c-bd76e69ec7f6@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:29:45AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> So it is with this in mind that I suggest we stay with the statically sized elfcorehdr buffer.
> 
> If that can be agreed upon, then it is "just a matter" of picking a useful
> elfcorehdr size. Currently that size is derived from the NR_DEFAULT_CPUS and
> CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES. So, there is still the CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES knob
> to help a dial in size, should there be some issue with the default
> value/size.

Let's see

        kbuf.memsz =
                (CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES) *
                        sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);

which, IINM, is

	(8192 + 32768) * 56

which is something like 2M.

(CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT = 8192 - this is because of MAXSMP which gets
set on distro kernels)

Now, since userspace kexec tools uses 2048 for max memory ranges, that
size becomes smaller - around half a Mb. And since y'all wanna be on the
safe side, you can quadruple it and have

	(8192 + 8192) * 56

which is still under a megabyte. And that's fine, I guess, on a big
server.

> Or if there is desire to drop computing the size from NR_DEFAULT_CPUs and

I think you should leave the dependency on the Kconfig size so that
smaller machines which are configured this way, don't end up wasting
unnecessary memory.

> It is my intention to correct the CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (if we keep it) as such:
> 
> config CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
>     depends on CRASH_DUMP && KEXEC_FILE && MEMORY_HOTPLUG

Yes, but don't leave it to the user to decide what number to choose
- choose a high enough number, explain why you've chosen this with a
comment and that's it.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette