Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:16:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:15:48 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:19465 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:15:46 -0500 Message-ID: <3A16C01C.8421220A@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:45:00 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rogier Wolff CC: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ? In-Reply-To: <200011181740.SAA14504@cave.bitwizard.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rogier Wolff wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and > > > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS? > > > > > > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :) > > > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported > > MODULE_foo - export specific symbol > > > > none of the above, export all globals but without modvers > ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!! > > I consider that a bug, but... eh? Can you give an example of this? This should definitely -not- be the case. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/