Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 30 Oct 2022 01:12:56 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, willy@infradead.org,
        dchinner@redhat.com, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
        Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>,
        Rohith Surabattula <rohiths.msft@gmail.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] get rid of unlikely() on page_copy_sane() calls
Message-ID: <Y14yCDdhW/QGOp+l@infradead.org>
References: <Y1btOP0tyPtcYajo@ZenIV>
 <20221028023352.3532080-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221028023352.3532080-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

This could explain why your are dropping the unlikely, 'cause just
from the page this is non-obvious.  Especially as the patch seems to
do a lot more than just removing an unlikely.