Received: by 2002:a05:6358:111d:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id f29csp107556rwi; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:25:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4iC+qT4eAFU464FRbROPrvY93CQO4MueFaWZyXC2wOBuzb7NnUyGDLPCcWyCi6OBv2a5A2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe46:b0:730:ca2b:cb7b with SMTP id wz6-20020a170906fe4600b00730ca2bcb7bmr11570267ejb.703.1667190338467; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:25:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667190338; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h7fizSVie44eg57WtwM80kZMTsqxPwwarDtVcTt9uuxNonloZ92zre/beRyIHu7ZcN CjwDsXMnf2ub6CAMfLDcRc2fIa9/bVMp2eQcyskLfOoxKPPgPZFrPslYWboHsqhVyC7d i64wTFADmrRpdSjFmasG6glMOv5PTYoKobsmLhoEQ0WbdaCqTKbw95MCr+pvmDgcv6tD jAOQ7Zv+lTzutc1v95KqlSlufoLtpn91yniB25JS+7kAIM/FS79btJ06p8nrs7EZrNNn TuCGj7JhxBcFq+vhcz+kxUnLoEq9TUZLoZJ+nQkTWi38Y2mP9ZFgKPwUGf13Qw8w4ldE bpuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :subject:references:cc:to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=vS3Fa053BIL6EuYplfoS8s77vqYeee4GzGnn63PcNoQ=; b=ECfrPJdKIJoGGiOjXMMAPJHcyuWAqgW+QvXMtTWJlfv4e+XCAbgNTAT0PsE/NPpYA/ dDPkGHtVa1knrGCaY+RB6M1/WJ5xvuvIidtn/7qhNaiE1AwSjK4CjZ5a10yybcpKozdl OcbaU4/DfmnQbJMUa4KJgD6wa/z7ik2+ZYyw5e3dvIQziMqae0wN4iDY7Biq9eAK+Mgh RFQYqnCQQ4+2wIZm4O2MajX9ElET4ikh1zVczRsRQ+Q4eKno3AlA14rMTWfZhdU+cecL UOUA/tLtK3n5FFdXk8kQUE3xYJ5Omt8Ogj0I4L9dq4cLAOC99JqZOjCpEzKMIlso2bbX j9Ww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qa37-20020a17090786a500b007826e727aeasi6290528ejc.44.2022.10.30.21.25.12; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229527AbiJaEHz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:07:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbiJaEHx (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:07:53 -0400 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 249567667; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R401e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=guorui.yu@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=19;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VTPBsm8_1667189266; Received: from 30.221.131.65(mailfrom:GuoRui.Yu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VTPBsm8_1667189266) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:07:48 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:07:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 To: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, david@redhat.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, x86@kernel.org References: <20221028141220.29217-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tdx: Do not allow #VE due to EPT violation on the private memory From: Guorui Yu In-Reply-To: <20221028141220.29217-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The core of this vulnerability is not directly related to the ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE, but the MMIO processing logic in #VE. We have encountered similar problems on SEV-ES, here are their fixes on Kernel [1] and OVMF[2]. Instead of enforcing the ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE in TDX guest kernel, I think the fix should also include necessary check on the MMIO path of the #VE routine. static int handle_mmio(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve) { unsigned long *reg, val, vaddr; char buffer[MAX_INSN_SIZE]; struct insn insn = {}; enum mmio_type mmio; int size, extend_size; u8 extend_val = 0; // Some addtional security check about ve->gpa should be introduced here. /* Only in-kernel MMIO is supported */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(user_mode(regs))) return -EFAULT; // ... } If we don't fix the problem at the point where we found, but rely on complicated composite logic and long comments in the kernel, I'm confident we'll fall back into the same pit in the near future :). [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/1a2dcbdde82e3a5f1db9b2f4c48aa1aeba534fb2/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c#L503 [2] OVMF: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/db2c22633f3c761975d8f469a0e195d8b79e1287/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c#L670