Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:32:51 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 net-next 11/17] mfd: ocelot: prepend resource size
 macros to be 32-bit
Message-ID: <Y1+WQ2ebtoBw0AgB@google.com>
References: <20221008185152.2411007-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
 <20221008185152.2411007-12-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20221008185152.2411007-12-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 08 Oct 2022, Colin Foster wrote:

> The *_RES_SIZE macros are initally <= 0x100. Future resource sizes will be
> upwards of 0x200000 in size.
> 
> To keep things clean, fully align the RES_SIZE macros to 32-bit to do
> nothing more than make the code more consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> ---
> 
> v3-v4
>     * No change
> 
> v2
>     * New patch - broken out from a different one
> 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/ocelot-core.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I'm guessing some of the other patches depend on this?

How should it be handled?

For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):

  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]