Received: by 2002:a05:6358:111d:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id f29csp1125839rwi; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7cpT0bIVCW3x4lHjHQAV1Mcnh7clG3WQ10cK9FTDfz3MmpMXM0qHQ3V+dbAMIhVuVIveNN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:d72:b0:56c:3c45:6953 with SMTP id n50-20020a056a000d7200b0056c3c456953mr15848042pfv.54.1667241668707; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667241668; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TMXCKJU4bxC04BeK1ylqQrVvhUwpzETmu/B3cnjiPgg1WO96WgCA0TGel9iI13HU1q 8X51yhChF8R6az/e4/5l3SEMtUiDH4Xfuul4QuFw24XkRJ07icfS3iqbUC+tNPwU/ugy /VYa7WkNYFicNFT3afjnf0YeXm3tQF7TA8bgKnQ9xPl/xVtPpN9GRCYAwMu7xuzq7sMx 4/Pqpxq+pf18kpiCWXDAhgN2Iy+D5IQpLORDF/upF0QshQHv7/QLSkxKilsLHzO/UoF2 4schNefrzugMgv/6N9ZikjifYf9OjjqRQF9ML3Cmcf5D2eRfkNx4+QocvBvLrjkaIzT5 tV7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=42D7b3PhaDq/nstKNJMlraRS5xfxJbbu2o0Am7cwEPg=; b=SZJ56lFH1VqugNqKFGmgWabgyWQQmBs5hkhRSJ6/2bCgNbkPp1UVOTR3/JXlJ3FwN6 qnPHSj3DE5Zo3wdeBE3Kma/7sLW+bz+T8qboA/SbQ6T19Rte3cUPUf6BSC0abl3P0luW Gv5wbKNKzu2R+dC6O9snnhM99GqKbqYSrnoDVFVu6gQzmTiAFjftR7rPq7arrXND8ob2 xPyODUnR79+J4dMcHC8O1CprKSp5diBxgRJWflYbncUIILe5ThTOyGEC9edZQpm+GPKt 1fMOaApuNCPHc/SK0N9rRvjj9OnMs/nwifqecI6U+29qcWq77e46WidrdKqzKWQXLxav 5sWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qJnkYQuW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21-20020a056a00239500b00543bb97c41esi11518541pfc.30.2022.10.31.11.40.55; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qJnkYQuW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231364AbiJaRa6 (ORCPT + 98 others); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:30:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231422AbiJaRa5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:30:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DFBDF31 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id q1-20020a17090a750100b002139ec1e999so6494517pjk.1 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=42D7b3PhaDq/nstKNJMlraRS5xfxJbbu2o0Am7cwEPg=; b=qJnkYQuWzdkUruJEeHJ6laBz9IEPJG2hNSPM6KHTZOxjlV/38DfZA/aQAcH5pc07tq Gg5CEL44sU6XvnWpXLEGJEU3J3pVr/F0lAv/HnlzAvBN4srIeeyLp8ZuNBOQd7uOb+Ht zR3mPrb+SSMrzyENL7HM1/2TOIFh1xUR8n2w5tcCGMnHjmzmXQht16cx2fTCVYOpC8YE pvHikVxXYoEnFikNJJ1sO/EBYSQdtBMhxeRM0bt+lHEbR5svNBemXAy7QwC3TTI5tL/9 OpiGxpIPWhDMdM/09GdT2To70WFGVEpcLjL3rGRmAh8NKWGLV/PxU4vHDPm+CcD4BVkI SN8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=42D7b3PhaDq/nstKNJMlraRS5xfxJbbu2o0Am7cwEPg=; b=mzhgvONXdPDwFYCmAcdhrS6Z0pRRgdVzq5S6yub7aFq9zPbxoMl+gxc719OGkwTjKd oNzbAc3UeVYfxiLU61UtzyZx6JHWQLgNXCv3cGPZNUddnf5curvswggxZbGMPbu/BgZD XD+y09kmo32nXidA9pZYNnqpDhhYA/U9ag6xqo+NGjMPErh+1KS+JdLkhwRJZWkrz+wy nf7YBVwvwUhHthtwV5t31TOk05gyxn1QwP48Hyg4xt7NFFiGxp6uDrO1EryJM6SBQMD1 wpelbH6f9bg7eI9zfv947zc8Xybn5YIik4Um1MkC8mm5DWkammIZh1V6dcdxzpWX+DQh 08/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0mNVbZ12cOsbkZMSycxVAIVmL7WynItMTAybHtLXuwq9fYg8L2 hpdwqBcUP6dKKIg+WskgG5OhEd8Ta2pIaWACEJk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:60e:b0:212:d5cd:4e58 with SMTP id gb14-20020a17090b060e00b00212d5cd4e58mr16179744pjb.165.1667237455464; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000000000000553fc805ec1380e0@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Yang Shi Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:30:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in alloc_charge_hpage To: "Zach O'Keefe" , Michal Hocko Cc: syzbot , Mel Gorman , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:44 PM Zach O'Keefe wrote: > > On Oct 28 10:37, Yang Shi wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:49 AM syzbot > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > syzbot found the following issue on: > > > > > > HEAD commit: a70385240892 Merge tag 'perf_urgent_for_v6.1_rc2' of git:/.. > > > git tree: upstream > > > console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13f4726a880000 > > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ea03ca45176080bc > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0044b22d177870ee974f > > > compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 > > > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13726f72880000 > > > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13b57436880000 > > > > > > Downloadable assets: > > > disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5e17f1e83cf3/disk-a7038524.raw.xz > > > vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f8ef729877f7/vmlinux-a7038524.xz > > > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: > > > Reported-by: syzbot+0044b22d177870ee974f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:221 [inline] > > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 hpage_collapse_alloc_page mm/khugepaged.c:807 [inline] > > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 alloc_charge_hpage+0x802/0xaa0 mm/khugepaged.c:963 > > > > It looks like the node requested by the allocation is offlined, and > > the allocation is using __GFP_THISNODE. It doesn't sound like > > khugepaged specific problem IIUC, I don't see other callsites do > > anything to prevent the node from being offlined. > > > > Shall we remove that warn? The page allocation call will return NULL > > anyway. Or we could just ignore the warn? > > > > Thanks for taking a look, Yang. > > As for the warn -- I don't see the value in the warning at present. As you > mention, I don't think it's a khugepaged-thing (as, at least from skimming, > other callsites don't take care to expect that the node is online). The > allocation might fail -- for a number of reasons -- and I don't think > __GFP_THISNODE + offline node is so special to deserve a warn. > > A different question, is if this particular callsite wants to defend against > that possibility. My understanding, which I state without data, is that the > performance of accessing remote memory outweighs the benefit of pmd-mapping the > memory -- and so I think we rightly fail here. > > So, my vote is to just remove the warn. Thanks, Zach. Did some archeology, it seems the warning was even stronger before commit 8addc2d00fe17 ("mm: do not warn on offline nodes unless the specific node is explicitly requested"). That commit softened the warning for __GFP_THISNODE. This warning seems not quite useful TBH because: * There is no guarantee the node is online for __GFP_THISNODE context * Kernel just fails the allocation regardless the warning, and it looks all callsites handle the allocation failure gracefully. So I think we'd better remove this warning. > > Thanks, > Zach > > > > Modules linked in: > > > CPU: 1 PID: 3646 Comm: syz-executor210 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-syzkaller-00454-ga70385240892 #0 > > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/11/2022 > > > RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:221 [inline] > > > RIP: 0010:hpage_collapse_alloc_page mm/khugepaged.c:807 [inline] > > > RIP: 0010:alloc_charge_hpage+0x802/0xaa0 mm/khugepaged.c:963 > > > Code: e5 01 4c 89 ee e8 6e f9 ae ff 4d 85 ed 0f 84 28 fc ff ff e8 70 fc ae ff 48 8d 6b ff 4c 8d 63 07 e9 16 fc ff ff e8 5e fc ae ff <0f> 0b e9 96 fa ff ff 41 bc 1a 00 00 00 e9 86 fd ff ff e8 47 fc ae > > > RSP: 0018:ffffc90003fdf7d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 > > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 > > > RDX: ffff888077f457c0 RSI: ffffffff81cd8f42 RDI: 0000000000000001 > > > RBP: ffff888079388c0c R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 > > > R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > FS: 00007f6b48ccf700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > CR2: 00007f6b48a819f0 CR3: 00000000171e7000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 > > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > collapse_file+0x1ca/0x5780 mm/khugepaged.c:1715 > > > hpage_collapse_scan_file+0xd6c/0x17a0 mm/khugepaged.c:2156 > > > madvise_collapse+0x53a/0xb40 mm/khugepaged.c:2611 > > > madvise_vma_behavior+0xd0a/0x1cc0 mm/madvise.c:1066 > > > madvise_walk_vmas+0x1c7/0x2b0 mm/madvise.c:1240 > > > do_madvise.part.0+0x24a/0x340 mm/madvise.c:1419 > > > do_madvise mm/madvise.c:1432 [inline] > > > __do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1432 [inline] > > > __se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1430 [inline] > > > __x64_sys_madvise+0x113/0x150 mm/madvise.c:1430 > > > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] > > > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd > > > RIP: 0033:0x7f6b48a4eef9 > > > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > > > RSP: 002b:00007f6b48ccf318 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000001c > > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6b48af0048 RCX: 00007f6b48a4eef9 > > > RDX: 0000000000000019 RSI: 0000000000600003 RDI: 0000000020000000 > > > RBP: 00007f6b48af0040 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6b48aa53a4 > > > R13: 00007f6b48bffcbf R14: 00007f6b48ccf400 R15: 0000000000022000 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > > > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > > > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. > > > > > > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > > > syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see: > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches > > >