Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933012AbXHDTg7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:36:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761439AbXHDTgv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:36:51 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:58198 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765372AbXHDTgv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:36:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:36:49 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: move non-layout parts of ufs_fs.h to fs/ufs/ Message-ID: <20070804193648.GV21089@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20070803140917.GA24385@lst.de> <20070804192431.GA12216@rain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070804192431.GA12216@rain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 15 On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 11:24:31PM +0400, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote: > Move prototypes and in-core structures to fs/ufs/ similar to what most > other filesystems already do. > > I made little modifications: move also ufs debug macros and > mount options constants into fs/ufs/ufs.h, this stuff > also private for ufs. Is there any reason to have util.h included directly? Or to have it as a separate file and not a part of ufs.h, while we are at it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/