Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:24:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:24:49 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:37638 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:24:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:24:21 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Rusty Russell , "David S. Miller" , , , , , , Subject: Re: SMP/cc Cluster description In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > I'd love to say that I can solve this with RCU, but it's vastly non-trivial > > and I haven't got code, so I'm not going to say that. 8) > > Lockless algos could help if we're able to have "good" quiescent point > inside the kernel. Or better have a good quiescent infrastructure to > have lockless code to plug in. Machines get dragged down by _uncontended_ locks, simply due to cache line ping-pong effects. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/