Received: by 2002:a05:6358:111d:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id f29csp3381416rwi; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:40:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7OHeNjQ6PQKPdZKaxlLLzHV4DeG0bFAK20soTvh8WiymQCuuw2MLiRQ0p5EwJL7KK7MEEv X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9414:b0:7ad:bde1:3ccf with SMTP id q20-20020a170906941400b007adbde13ccfmr17725005ejx.543.1667360456355; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:40:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667360456; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mEaClsHulccEu2DajlL9ZDgOyn2sUfMwukh7PfLbFf8PVz+1+9lMPCE5rVZjfgtdAU gWGEkSQIiLe4Yxu4HtVsOd2HFrQtd4iAbZKQU6mXNmL9yK1aMT76Pw7XAi8/oeGErqsX AD2yssWQjHFIZHrJ0Ndbwhqr5A7h7MU+vzMNrEAKp90o7/zUCUCaDfv93Bc50b1BUTmp CCB7Ludh0Hd7C7x12958lgL+mdAbN1hJQ/6SBOHh1DWn3SLlnFR76+uOIwXfjFhrwwyD XjC+rORJUJhQeJbxURX0y7Gy5Y+8kBJ85VtwOMvzOQvNV1hBWzLVu6BeSv16XOmeoyeb Sgwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=LTGG083JVBWQzbjXbJKbENkCHKgU33jxdCH6MExOnb8=; b=JhDPuOz2NaBydN22hH4RX2NBSy/VtIb/jXxJCZ2tX+rQ1DRewTlOa3jf6BBh2Woh9R zuOX+El2AuZgLpC2C2s3y7G0+4qiBxSemlP0H1AkbsIoVwuDl1srmJdheBhjZ5tPtubx 3ViQqF2yhJ4zoBrPJR/ZpwrQzpwmXmdoeHFlmpkHzA49D1sGopLOQ36+4VYoFkOvl+eY 8IlDH3Bon9pjON5FDV9Bm1Zj8VitS2oKWewSjXepm5DsQrKgEM+Tn3oaef170Dir6TnA sNa+B10ux61VH0FatJe4fxMzTpLNmZXrLZ2pxXAMdjp+KJLPzflcxWV07ZAIYfds439v 0Y4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f20-20020a0564021e9400b004637e16cf97si9591313edf.597.2022.11.01.20.40.33; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230301AbiKBCmG (ORCPT + 97 others); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 22:42:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230297AbiKBCmD (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 22:42:03 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A242A209BA for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4N2B430qC4z15MJX; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:41:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.230] (10.174.176.230) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:41:57 +0800 Message-ID: <4062c19c-518e-ee5e-36d9-850cf174cc6a@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:41:56 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] comedi: Fix potential memory leak in comedi_init() To: Ian Abbott , Greg KH CC: , , , References: <20221101032125.27337-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com> <32c291d7-0e87-ec1f-e2af-28d7f8ca0981@huawei.com> <5b8ee99d-2358-39c5-b663-2d1c80353639@mev.co.uk> <5344d255-5186-dc97-89f0-0b8c40f65324@huawei.com> <83f1aa93-bbd9-925e-a1d4-26729262a008@mev.co.uk> From: shangxiaojing In-Reply-To: <83f1aa93-bbd9-925e-a1d4-26729262a008@mev.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.230] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/11/1 23:59, Ian Abbott wrote: > On 01/11/2022 11:57, shangxiaojing wrote: >> >> >> On 2022/11/1 19:40, Ian Abbott wrote: >>> On 01/11/2022 06:16, shangxiaojing wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2022/11/1 12:45, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:21:25AM +0800, Shang XiaoJing wrote: >>>>>> comedi_init() will goto out_unregister_chrdev_region if cdev_add() >>>>>> failed, which won't free the resource alloced in kobject_set_name(). >>>>>> Call kfree_const() to free the leaked name before goto >>>>>> out_unregister_chrdev_region. >>>>>> >>>>>> unreferenced object 0xffff8881000fa8c0 (size 8): >>>>>>    comm "modprobe", pid 239, jiffies 4294905173 (age 51.308s) >>>>>>    hex dump (first 8 bytes): >>>>>>      63 6f 6d 65 64 69 00 ff                          comedi.. >>>>>>    backtrace: >>>>>>      [<000000005f9878f7>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4c/0x1c0 >>>>>>      [<000000000fd70302>] kstrdup+0x3f/0x70 >>>>>>      [<000000009428bc33>] kstrdup_const+0x46/0x60 >>>>>>      [<00000000ed50d9de>] kvasprintf_const+0xdb/0xf0 >>>>>>      [<00000000b2766964>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x3c/0xe0 >>>>>>      [<00000000f2424ef7>] kobject_set_name+0x62/0x90 >>>>>>      [<000000005d5a125b>] 0xffffffffa0013098 >>>>>>      [<00000000f331e663>] do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x380 >>>>>>      [<00000000aa7bac96>] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 >>>>>>      [<000000005fd72335>] load_module+0x227d/0x2420 >>>>>>      [<00000000ad550cf1>] __do_sys_finit_module+0xd5/0x140 >>>>>>      [<00000000069a60c5>] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 >>>>>>      [<00000000c5e0d521>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: ed9eccbe8970 ("Staging: add comedi core") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing >>>>>> --- >>>>>>   drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c | 5 ++++- >>>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c >>>>>> b/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c >>>>>> index e2114bcf815a..2c508c2cf6f6 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c >>>>>> @@ -3379,8 +3379,11 @@ static int __init comedi_init(void) >>>>>>       retval = cdev_add(&comedi_cdev, MKDEV(COMEDI_MAJOR, 0), >>>>>>                 COMEDI_NUM_MINORS); >>>>>> -    if (retval) >>>>>> +    if (retval) { >>>>>> +        kfree_const(comedi_cdev.kobj.name); >>>>>> +        comedi_cdev.kobj.name = NULL; >>>>>>           goto out_unregister_chrdev_region; >>>>>> +    } >>>>> >>>>> A driver should never have to poke around in the internals of a cdev >>>>> object like this.  Please fix the cdev core to not need this if >>>>> cdev_add() fails. >>> >>> Or at least there should be a function that can be called to undo the >>> allocations of kobject_set_name(). >> >> It's ok to add a pair function, but maybe only one place where used >> cdev_add() need free name. Your mean all "kfree_const(name);" should >> be replaced to the new function? >> >>> >>>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had checked all 67 places that used cdev_add(), and only the >>>> following 5 functions set the name before the cdev_add(): >>>> >>>> 1. comedi_init(), will memleak and will be fixed by this patch. >>>> 2. hfi1_cdev_init(), won't memleak. >>>> 3. qib_cdev_init(), won't memleak. >>>> 4. uio_major_init(), won't memleak. >>>> 5. __register_chrdev(), won't memleak. >>>> >>>> As the result, I just fix the code in comedi_init(). Should I still >>>> fix the cdev core code, which is free the name in cdev_add() fail path? >>> >>> I'm stuck trying to work out why hfi1_cdev_init() doesn't have the >>> same problem when cdev_add() returns an error. >>> >> >> Only user_add() calls the hfi1_cdev_init(), and will call >> user_remove() if hfi1_cdev_init() failed. In user_remove(), >> hfi1_cdev_cleanup() will call cdev_del(). > > No it won't.  hfi1_cdev_cleanup() only calls cdev_del() if device is > non-null, but device will be null if the call to cdev_add() failed in > hfi1_cdev_init(). > Right, device won't be inited, so there has the same potential memleak. Thanks, -- Shang XiaoJing