Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760308AbXHEOVZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:21:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752513AbXHEOVR (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:21:17 -0400 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:33362 "EHLO longford.lazybastard.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752102AbXHEOVQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:21:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:17:09 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , J??rn Engel , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com, richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, david@lang.hm Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 Message-ID: <20070805141708.GB25753@lazybastard.org> References: <46B4C0A8.1000902@garzik.org> <20070804191205.GA24723@lazybastard.org> <20070804192130.GA25346@elte.hu> <20070804211156.5f600d80@the-village.bc.nu> <20070804202830.GA4538@elte.hu> <20070804210351.GA9784@elte.hu> <20070804225121.5c7b66e0@the-village.bc.nu> <20070805072141.GA4414@elte.hu> <20070805085354.GC6002@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070805085354.GC6002@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 35 On Sun, 5 August 2007 10:53:54 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:21:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > btw., Mutt does not go boom, i use it myself. It works just fine and > > notices new mails even on a noatime,nodiratime filesystem. > > IIRC, atime is used by mailers and by the shell to detect that new > mail has arrived and report it only once if there are several intances > watching the same mbox. > > I too use mutt and noatime,nodiratime everywhere (same 10 year-old > thinko), and the only side effect is that when I have a new mail, > it is reported in all of my xterms until I read it, clearly something > I can live with (and sometimes it's even desirable). > > In fact, mutt is pretty good at this. It updates atime and ctime itself > as soon as it opens the mbox, so the shell is happy and only reports > "you have mail" afterwards. For me mutt fails to recognize new mail. And the difference might be this: http://www.google.de/search?q=enable-buffy-size Jörn -- Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small. Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is frequently going to be big, don't get fancy. -- Rob Pike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/