Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:34:43 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <palmer@dabbelt.com>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: stop selecting device drivers in Kconfig.socs
Message-ID: <Y2JHw/y1oWkLpOb2@wendy>
References: <20221005171348.167476-1-conor@kernel.org>
 <Y15nwXmn7rToJkH2@spud>
 <Y2IXrD4FpXNmDDPk@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2IXrD4FpXNmDDPk@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 08:09:32AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:02:09PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:13:43PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > 
> > > As my RFC [0] series doing the symbol name changes has not yet reached
> > > consensus, I've split out the removal of device driver selects into a
> > > new series. I kept the plic as a direct select - although given how Maz
> > > is treating the SiFive plic driver as the RISC-V plic driver, maybe that
> > > should just be selected by default at an arch level...
> > > 
> > > I assume the individual patches can go via their subsystems & I'll
> > > resubmit the arch/riscv patches a cycle later? I'm not in any rush.
> > 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > What's the story here with the two serial patches, they just waiting for
> > an Ack? I think these are archived on the riscv patchwork, so if that is
> > the case I'll unarchive them and mark as needing one.
> 
> Sorry for the delay, I'll take both of them through the tty/serial tree.

nw Greg, thanks.

@Palmer, I'll re-submit the Kconfig.socs bits of this after v6.2-rc1.

Thanks,
Conor.