Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <25d7e982-f959-d86c-a6e7-5efd1db1e75c@posteo.de>
Date:   Wed,  2 Nov 2022 15:57:56 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From:   postix@posteo.eu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [REGRESSION 6.0.x / 6.1.x] NULL dereferencing at tracing
To:     rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        tiwai@suse.de
References: <e693eb6b-28d0-d091-3df3-60f2b591c0e7@posteo.de>
 <71829e56-a13f-0462-37a7-a4d64c16f561@posteo.de>
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
Reply-To: 20221031144850.5522b036@rorschach.local.home
In-Reply-To: <71829e56-a13f-0462-37a7-a4d64c16f561@posteo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello everyone,

I have added lot's of debug printk's to see what's happening and I found 
that the "cpu" counter, which is used to access the buffer's array 
elements (cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]) in the ring_buffer_wake_waiters
function, exceeds the maximum number of total of total cores, namely in 
my case 24, which means, it should only run from 0..23. However, upon 
debugging, it runs up to 31, and thus causing a NULL pointer dereference 
(&cpu_buffer->irq_work).

After adding a return statement in case cpu > 24, the bug is no longer 
reproducible.

You can find the diff between v6.1-rc2 and the patched version with 
added debug log in [1].
The corresponding dmesg output can be found in [2].

I hope this gives you a good hint to find the root cause!

[1] https://paste.opensuse.org/e60601aa
[2] https://paste.opensuse.org/bf1398ce