Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:34:17 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dpkg fails on sparc64 (was: [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/thp: Carry over
 dirty bit when thp splits on pmd)
Message-ID: <Y2K4Kd8JRWa1noLB@x1n>
References: <20220811161331.37055-1-peterx@redhat.com>
 <20220811161331.37055-5-peterx@redhat.com>
 <20221021160603.GA23307@u164.east.ru>
 <Y1Wbi4yyVvDtg4zN@x1n>
 <CADxRZqy+cMHN4FjtDr7-LOyVf0y+G8MPiBoGiTEsSj48jBfVnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y1f2IR+h4i2+/swj@x1n>
 <CADxRZqz+Sk=yxrJQ8B7UVkrcct9w6nUeiaaVn7QTFL59isFLDA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADxRZqz+Sk=yxrJQ8B7UVkrcct9w6nUeiaaVn7QTFL59isFLDA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 04:13:20PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 5:43 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:22:45PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 10:53 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 07:06:03PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811161331.37055-5-peterx@redhat.com
> >
> > Maybe we need to have the minimum revert for v6.1 before we have more
> > clues.
> 
> Just a quick update on 6.1.0-rc3
> 
> Tested again with 6.1.0-rc3, segfaults dpkg... applied patch - no dpkg
> segfaults.

Andrew, shall we apply the minimum revert for this patch for now?  The
one-liner was attached in this email I replied to Anatoly:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1Wbi4yyVvDtg4zN@x1n/

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu