Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:37:54 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To:     Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Cc:     seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Fix a typo about the usage of kvcalloc()
Message-ID: <Y2Mpgm+zEetfZlWM@debian.me>
References: <20221103011749.139262-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7Bj2J/Ny5mTe2nT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221103011749.139262-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk


--g7Bj2J/Ny5mTe2nT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 09:17:49AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> Swap the 1st and 2nd arguments to be consistent with the usage of
> kvcalloc().
>=20

This isn't typofix as suggested from the patch subject, right?

--=20
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

--g7Bj2J/Ny5mTe2nT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCY2MpfgAKCRD2uYlJVVFO
o7viAPkBnv2MutmdeR8i1olYydOxlacezVPJ3lXxLELtoChVDQEAkadliI+V3GQb
jLNxotI2n263ofu9eEIO7nxvdr2SeAo=
=0KCs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--g7Bj2J/Ny5mTe2nT--