Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc module arch checks
In-Reply-To: <Y2MEw6BruH3FnYL/@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20221031120733.3956781-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
 <Y2MEw6BruH3FnYL/@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 03 Nov 2022 20:35:32 +1100
Message-ID: <87leoss7mj.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:07:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Luis if you would be okay for patch 1 to be merged via powerpc or
>> prefer to take it in the module tree (or maybe you object to the
>> code in the first place).
>
> Looks good to me, and nothing on my radar which would cause a conflict
> so happy for you to take it via powerpc or I can take it and apply it
> right away to tricke / get tested on linux-next by tomorrow.
>
> Let me know.

Thanks. I guess it's mostly a nop on other architectures, so probably
makes sense for me to take it.

cheers