Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To:     kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
        david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
        hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB
Date:   Thu,  3 Nov 2022 16:26:30 +0100
Message-Id: <20221103152631.17393-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

This is a v3 of the previously called:
[PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: fix crycb virtual vs physical usage
and 
[PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB

Changes:

1->2 After David's comment that the patch has not to do with
     virtual vs physical, I reworked the commit message.

2->3 rename crycb_o crycb_gpa and apcb_o apcb_gpa
     gpa = Guest Physical Address 

I resent the patch because I think that even the previous
version is not really buggy, this new version brings clarity.

Regards,
Pierre


Pierre Morel (1):
  KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB

 arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1