Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 00:22:39 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
        openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT" 
        <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning
Message-ID: <Y2RNP/5Xfs0qS/3X@zn.tnic>
References: <20221031080604.6xei6c4e3ckhsvmy@kamzik>
 <Y1+OUawGJDjh4DOJ@zn.tnic>
 <20221031100327.r7tswmpszvs5ot5n@kamzik>
 <Y2K6clNJBn0SbWU+@zn.tnic>
 <20221103125945.lrr5oxxmylwpam53@kamzik>
 <Y2PX9GfxWYh6+XGT@zn.tnic>
 <20221103153404.uh77nrdkowrxj6cr@kamzik>
 <Y2PsvvOWVs9ZLBsp@yury-laptop>
 <Y2PxAiJ1yNzcUSgs@zn.tnic>
 <Y2P68sfCJMvhKmhj@yury-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2P68sfCJMvhKmhj@yury-laptop>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:31:30AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> Let's take for example cpu_llc_shared_mask() added by you in
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h recently:
> 
>   static inline struct cpumask *cpu_llc_shared_mask(int cpu)
>   {
>          return per_cpu(cpu_llc_shared_map, cpu);
>   }
> 
> It's in a global header and available to the rest of the kernel, just as
> well.

Just like 

static inline struct cpumask *cpu_l2c_shared_mask(int cpu)
{
        return per_cpu(cpu_l2c_shared_map, cpu);
}

should check != must check. 

But it's perfectly fine if you're going to attempt to prove some bogus
argument of yours - I can safely ignore you.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette