Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221103205546.24836-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <20221103205546.24836-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <7cfe285d-eb82-1840-0149-b5b77f2beaae@linaro.org>
 <Y2T0MT2mZ5kghUQ1@shikoro>
In-Reply-To: <Y2T0MT2mZ5kghUQ1@shikoro>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:21:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXd1B=BbePp9X21ptUbr9tp9Qz4JPYBbvzCVtRjN+A97w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: white-hawk-cpu: sort RWDT entry correctly
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Wolfram,

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:15 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> > But I doubt that there is a bug here. Style (like order of things) is
> > not a bug.
>
> Okay, I'll be more strict next time. Geert, could you kindly drop the
> Fixes tag or shall I resend?

Consider it done, no need to resend.
BTW, I guess the stable machinery will pick it up anyway...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds