Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cd:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id r13csp878221rwl; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:23:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4rzBfDRmI4HICOs+DirhiRmMN3CdxuA0TI7zkh2J29G4JdQYB79Smuch8HFTwUA4y0gxqi X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b09:b0:213:655c:158b with SMTP id lx9-20020a17090b4b0900b00213655c158bmr37340159pjb.119.1667571825971; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667571825; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dqLsNzNspIp5HMigWiBaXREDjvdZxxa6/w53QOEb5GgY/Yfs0p2DohWvS+fUAYnbg+ tp6PHTEDOn2oP6W5dDRg+cDopZTj9w8u6TVK34r/+fialY8a23V04hySg7IZEzBrcdAC TQalGr/mBoNy0HSTTux+3Pi27LfgG7VPUl+hbPfk9jj2H3gI54Y6xjT7QGJ/KDUdlnRj IMkLVl38A0uv7jb5KRmCNUNMVWu0HSxnjn655Nv+Wz9qydSTsaaWPVh4EimvZimIVx69 j3b2eUvO2BUFyJWuRCAySoHqabkvKCGtzYvz8WKwE8lYQWulBZSfD6Ajahocu4iULO3j GKTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=2LgFHqesXEWN/mGF9Mv3kgNRPUHTZQzwfP6syMbLtvE=; b=BFA0xAETcXVKDopqRuCfTcxXP4wF2Kbebz1kcTRXAer1gvkAcgM0uWHRMiSrvZEysM VILGCbn4zyBcrODGmf4TaoHcuc11Lh7Lqi186gomjy/tV+iNz/6XK4d/eOO5GjGZ/YeM EwHHPTqKOlFZFBmjUm2IfuXZ9h5VOgDaZahw/mQQwTJ+KkLponACCHGZpNvH+Y68mE1X yim+XCwiVjD6HEYrtBSrlS8KCCCsZLBVykIOV/y+77nstz1m6nek/XNsaTYWUvM4RV1d HCDtxGF7b4013fH0wXyLC9B/j2nGn/bVPW2s27j6q5GwLMZZUTdf2L5U1qOns3G2dULX fOmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=JWtEjnpX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u16-20020a170902a61000b001733a212ccfsi4380206plq.330.2022.11.04.07.23.33; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b=JWtEjnpX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232135AbiKDOTk (ORCPT + 96 others); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:19:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34582 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231969AbiKDOTF (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:19:05 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A4F2181; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1667571543; x=1699107543; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+W6heY0OWTfT6RRvl+2wVYvfqiqmJULsVcGpkSGMnWY=; b=JWtEjnpXp2S85w7Li1v/yUjZDCkgnlUtAPnBKo88ijp8aPumEAPYoLyj XlgWYm1gDh5BUyPrEPgnOkJQ0D3LwRsfrlHkk+wq3LrCAdK+gDjQGNfVz 2Ld/pjTkx3cxygcqf3wG2EQ6Z2+IjTZFJBY0EwJtsSsx6Y6mM5YcHB39O Zh+SL3GeMCmw/ibZ19ecoNzdobo9tzj1mnoy3WDJK1JuHX8Qto4qD6LQK r1ir1YuViKt8/RGAGiavGtcQHPDjhIhlRQt5VEhMmCvt2ymx4jSU2v+yT yMraZibxAxNEVSzSJNm9m4WtE+SGeDb4Y3pF8EuI+I0hRoDxS0WF4kGEb A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,137,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="185411580" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa2.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 04 Nov 2022 07:19:02 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:18:59 -0700 Received: from den-dk-m31857.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:18:56 -0700 From: Steen Hegelund To: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni CC: Steen Hegelund , , Randy Dunlap , "Casper Andersson" , Russell King , Wan Jiabing , "Nathan Huckleberry" , , , , "Daniel Machon" , Horatiu Vultur , Lars Povlsen Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 6/8] net: microchip: sparx5: Let VCAP API validate added key- and actionfields Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20221104141830.1527159-7-steen.hegelund@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221104141830.1527159-1-steen.hegelund@microchip.com> References: <20221104141830.1527159-1-steen.hegelund@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add support for validating keyfields and actionfields when they are added to a VCAP rule. We need to ensure that the field is not already present and that the field is in the key- or actionset, if the client has added a key- or actionset to the rule at this point. Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund --- .../net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c index 37122ba1e201..73ec7744c21f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c @@ -790,6 +790,13 @@ const char *vcap_keyfield_name(struct vcap_control *vctrl, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vcap_keyfield_name); +/* map action field id to a string with the action name */ +static const char *vcap_actionfield_name(struct vcap_control *vctrl, + enum vcap_action_field action) +{ + return vctrl->stats->actionfield_names[action]; +} + /* Return the keyfield that matches a key in a keyset */ static const struct vcap_field * vcap_find_keyset_keyfield(struct vcap_control *vctrl, @@ -1162,14 +1169,60 @@ static void vcap_copy_from_client_keyfield(struct vcap_rule *rule, memcpy(&field->data, data, sizeof(field->data)); } +/* Check if the keyfield is already in the rule */ +static bool vcap_keyfield_unique(struct vcap_rule *rule, + enum vcap_key_field key) +{ + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); + const struct vcap_client_keyfield *ckf; + + list_for_each_entry(ckf, &ri->data.keyfields, ctrl.list) + if (ckf->ctrl.key == key) + return false; + return true; +} + +/* Check if the keyfield is in the keyset */ +static bool vcap_keyfield_match_keyset(struct vcap_rule *rule, + enum vcap_key_field key) +{ + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); + enum vcap_keyfield_set keyset = rule->keyset; + enum vcap_type vt = ri->admin->vtype; + const struct vcap_field *fields; + + /* the field is accepted if the rule has no keyset yet */ + if (keyset == VCAP_KFS_NO_VALUE) + return true; + fields = vcap_keyfields(ri->vctrl, vt, keyset); + if (!fields) + return false; + /* if there is a width there is a way */ + return fields[key].width > 0; +} + static int vcap_rule_add_key(struct vcap_rule *rule, enum vcap_key_field key, enum vcap_field_type ftype, struct vcap_client_keyfield_data *data) { + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); struct vcap_client_keyfield *field; - /* More validation will be added here later */ + if (!vcap_keyfield_unique(rule, key)) { + pr_warn("%s:%d: keyfield %s is already in the rule\n", + __func__, __LINE__, + vcap_keyfield_name(ri->vctrl, key)); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!vcap_keyfield_match_keyset(rule, key)) { + pr_err("%s:%d: keyfield %s does not belong in the rule keyset\n", + __func__, __LINE__, + vcap_keyfield_name(ri->vctrl, key)); + return -EINVAL; + } + field = kzalloc(sizeof(*field), GFP_KERNEL); if (!field) return -ENOMEM; @@ -1262,14 +1315,60 @@ static void vcap_copy_from_client_actionfield(struct vcap_rule *rule, memcpy(&field->data, data, sizeof(field->data)); } +/* Check if the actionfield is already in the rule */ +static bool vcap_actionfield_unique(struct vcap_rule *rule, + enum vcap_action_field act) +{ + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); + const struct vcap_client_actionfield *caf; + + list_for_each_entry(caf, &ri->data.actionfields, ctrl.list) + if (caf->ctrl.action == act) + return false; + return true; +} + +/* Check if the actionfield is in the actionset */ +static bool vcap_actionfield_match_actionset(struct vcap_rule *rule, + enum vcap_action_field action) +{ + enum vcap_actionfield_set actionset = rule->actionset; + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); + enum vcap_type vt = ri->admin->vtype; + const struct vcap_field *fields; + + /* the field is accepted if the rule has no actionset yet */ + if (actionset == VCAP_AFS_NO_VALUE) + return true; + fields = vcap_actionfields(ri->vctrl, vt, actionset); + if (!fields) + return false; + /* if there is a width there is a way */ + return fields[action].width > 0; +} + static int vcap_rule_add_action(struct vcap_rule *rule, enum vcap_action_field action, enum vcap_field_type ftype, struct vcap_client_actionfield_data *data) { + struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule); struct vcap_client_actionfield *field; - /* More validation will be added here later */ + if (!vcap_actionfield_unique(rule, action)) { + pr_warn("%s:%d: actionfield %s is already in the rule\n", + __func__, __LINE__, + vcap_actionfield_name(ri->vctrl, action)); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!vcap_actionfield_match_actionset(rule, action)) { + pr_err("%s:%d: actionfield %s does not belong in the rule actionset\n", + __func__, __LINE__, + vcap_actionfield_name(ri->vctrl, action)); + return -EINVAL; + } + field = kzalloc(sizeof(*field), GFP_KERNEL); if (!field) return -ENOMEM; -- 2.38.1