Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 09:27:32 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
        "andersson@kernel.org" <andersson@kernel.org>,
        "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        "festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping
Message-ID: <20221104152732.GA1873068@p14s>
References: <20221102111410.38737-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
 <CANLsYky+FPNi82kDwgJBzdoxS5=SBXBqiRRFNCvt4ihUpJS+9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <DU0PR04MB9417B48835B77695D7BD535788389@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DU0PR04MB9417B48835B77695D7BD535788389@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 06:11:46AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping
> > 
> > On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 05:12, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > >
> > > According to updated reference mannual, the M33 DRAM view of
> > > 0x[C,D]0000000 maps to A55 0xC0000000, so correct it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9222fabf0e39 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX93")
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 2c471e46f4ca..9fc978e0393c
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
> > imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > >         { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > >         { 0x90000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > >
> > > -       { 0xC0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > -       { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > +       { 0xC0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > +       { 0xD0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > 
> > But how did this work before?  Were some SoC released with the old
> > mapping?

As it is regularly the case, you have not answered all my questions.

> The current m33 firmware release with Linux SDK only has
> TCM version, so I not have image to test the DDR mapping. 
> 
> Initially we got the information that M33 mapping of DRAM.
> DRAM (offset 0 MB)	DRAM	80000000
> DRAM (offset 256 MB)	DRAM	A0000000
> DRAM (offset 512 MB)	DRAM	C0000000
> 
> However the information is wrong after we check more,
> there is an 256MB hole, 0MB [0x80000000, 0x8fffffff],
> 512MB [0xa0000000, 0xafffffff], 
> 1024MB [0xc0000000, 0xcfffffff]
> 
> I use JTAG to confirm it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> > 
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qm[] = {
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >