Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cd:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id r13csp1229491rwl; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:16:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4PAPRkpiNwrxnj4M9p6NtANjJ84y5RGin/xqt4lhK3qmUC2CQEwHaGzASYh9WS2koFgfNf X-Received: by 2002:a63:d848:0:b0:46f:81cb:6d6c with SMTP id k8-20020a63d848000000b0046f81cb6d6cmr30660673pgj.453.1667585819172; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:16:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667585819; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=f6V/MtM3uSHRFxNoja5RyjpxPhvVEPG0FAk1hzAIfoplLeBOg6sxGokzqsDbfts++e qEf73A0U1yOkqJOns/J4gNI7f/X587/46xUXzgwKejjfP/2Tf2CgyGdE9ItX/jAPdP4a 77zJR7i+tAyK4zUeW7L1iJs6nz2XWP6yO165DwSVu8sDCx0gLcrLqanZ0PfEmsan7MyV gZsrrEiiypmwDmK4MV0VFLmKA3wy2H9TIX+6ofyyH0oLWtFa9l23wTTjlfEZOgIHrBlY CAgC4NaGsH9jV5GpPK6b4/AdDfnEwivnHTJK2G8Em186ij9YvAjBs6oLVyYNHnEpTMBj 3Euw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=f+XDeehPqNp624nEDoMBsjLPMyAJCxTSXH00KpaKjDM=; b=xN85dVGlcBjvCQhWvErtWg+1qHcLyH/+oCpCEDwtI+J/M2MPOTTZgztoNfbeMOhxFA 8/PZ0egcaoxzfqH8iQO8VVHE9q0NVk3mZJOp+nqnafyil9JBzp4aU8zOrGeW1iZHqyea SZvFu8IxjuGNMkxZabAI4PvlQ4F033tTztx/RXFNQ8+/+sssIlZFn+3EAjvTtSxNUIrl V/zo+cUOCacnRS9ZaLrNGicITeq6C7yfsnDBi0zRAUvyY6bPpY+BVMzp6rwMRsEt3zk7 dF94dDHrSMlQmCmnBIEJABU3HpePb762aza92aSoYaCZMqI2C+BSV6Q+isxCluXHh+Cc 6Rsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Z9W5ylLM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eb9-20020a056a004c8900b0056c7cc1f23fsi1433129pfb.132.2022.11.04.11.16.45; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Z9W5ylLM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231942AbiKDRoc (ORCPT + 96 others); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:44:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232003AbiKDRn7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:43:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA6243AC4 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id k5so5111216pjo.5 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:42:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f+XDeehPqNp624nEDoMBsjLPMyAJCxTSXH00KpaKjDM=; b=Z9W5ylLMWmuZ9SryJuhJRN6uHAb5shD1HeVtH7f/1sPFa5bCW/gxHhDhv2U2xM0Q9+ WzD9zdducnvmd5a6yJzl1cfcMvqit9cJVTro5URoQJAFZ+90rBzTHX1dhXzm0AS+LaQ0 RwH6JBMH5aseoQrkbqKBdSQmkqEii7Gh3tee5eMtjU97xH5U7JkPmgL0fgNnx9mL7rLS 5ts9zHbGGk9kploiu77beLpy/dX99+U3p1rsGV8uG/LictREBLL+3DVatyh64o0lHVU6 6FbetaecqW/LW4x2dMmOy+poShuQEHIZs42AmBOsWemA815kMtYmoCo+lbK5Jkz2w3hf RyXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=f+XDeehPqNp624nEDoMBsjLPMyAJCxTSXH00KpaKjDM=; b=Bf3nIfwIiuCcFS6IWPZz27f2XFp7ntI76PBL6WxFoB8gHIK7BGrfaXT1CBWa7VLe+0 jKC0wK13euCaeUUGhRE4iahzxVp6o0upTS8M/uK0wh23kTX/sSxnm4mPHdrI3ZbGUG4l Uq3mhNpKscSCfiuR5BSn6QzVSJqoAJVkuTZQrGc+3W+3vmMPPk5EJqpYfQLplbFWKhF1 YTDPaD7GJbm63xdgeGIE4goQyoOOt81se6D964Gz0MhFitSOWJNrXTQK3Mv7Y17OX85u fTE4WbWHPOHGKUjfaiPffcw1D93zqjt18KMHoLHWFgJBPnG5Jowiwf5QaUbtZcLDzbJM DUvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3hUQo7ZMkYIMBAIHDh5+z56OVe5DTkTrsXdXsEXR6GnvC2pSw9 pTB44OThZBdrt00yS0hr2+JqyTr6cQOFVs222Fk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d512:b0:181:f1f4:fcb4 with SMTP id b18-20020a170902d51200b00181f1f4fcb4mr37068477plg.102.1667583777463; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:42:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221103213641.7296-1-shy828301@gmail.com> <20221103213641.7296-2-shy828301@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Yang Shi Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:42:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] mm: don't warn if the node is offlined To: Michal Hocko Cc: zokeefe@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 2:56 AM Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 04-11-22 10:35:21, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h > > index ef4aea3b356e..308daafc4871 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/gfp.h > > +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h > > @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static inline > > struct folio *__folio_alloc_node(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order, int nid) > > { > > VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES); > > - VM_WARN_ON((gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) && !node_online(nid)); > > + if((gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) && !node_online(nid)) { > > or maybe even better > if ((gfp & (__GFP_THISNODE|__GFP_NOWARN) == __GFP_THISNODE|__GFP_NOWARN) && !node_online(nid)) > > because it doesn't really make much sense to dump this information if > the allocation failure is going to provide sufficient (and even more > comprehensive) context for the failure. It looks more hairy but this can > be hidden in a nice little helper shared between the two callers. Thanks a lot for the suggestion, printing warning if the gfp flag allows sounds like a good idea to me. Will adopt it. But the check should look like: if ((gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) && !(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN) && !node_online(nid)) > > > + pr_warn("%pGg allocation from offline node %d\n", &gfp, nid); > > + dump_stack(); > > + } > > > > return __folio_alloc(gfp, order, nid, NULL); > > } > > -- > > Michal Hocko > > SUSE Labs > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs