Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cd:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id r13csp1306601rwl; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4lah3nW9Q9b455cG3geNufWEd3BKwDm9gqklTHISCj8VITucJEUPToEXYILa8y7HWeC1V2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:371a:b0:7ad:c01c:6fa0 with SMTP id d26-20020a170906371a00b007adc01c6fa0mr31491599ejc.267.1667589393332; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667589393; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bAcIiDMBpQY3HvSa4spk0xNVTdZelE/feqq0qyrfVlNe2UDVO3J6zDs/vze2z72MWy Tqjqz9Y8h3PZc6dDVv8UtnOAAYbpMx1wyycET5n1F1xAUj61aaIrLSFeI002pvYqCI++ +quhf8qfGGezzGeg6/HrreF7tvk2RXa6XKTH55FV8k4ikcC3/4O8cMm4KZQb6yToWjPC Cpd5NRayNtmfFZIlcPnv9ZW2FxMb89lBLSreQBXAsu5srPhiUbCFljpZV3C0HMLaXpZR fAPFt73Il0jIhHSB/v64nJr+Hh1kXSffY41y2lvFXWfNFm+7on5e/4VGCVYry7h/Cp0P yIVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ymOCm6buEXMesTkew4LPkP5gX6OVyxVyRkGD4N+Jrcw=; b=GCqAUj6kIWBCeZldmAbwd7rk9t+rjuIefJcOcVifSj2oXMVSpz3/0iKIsfXLBKDe+V AJ5BBwGWJvqJBpYnJQlYcPqX4kxColLI7j7Za5AUNGCcTc92uW5xLehUW8xXFc6wLxam 1MRxqW1QFyRYXYEI2mYwB+qqp3zNPeoTzyz/u6pmS+Q2EP0EuZ4GfhNpZkrYWpWYHGDR dXAKfnoWyb6Ltr/vVnhjWlB5bQlYKRDRjcKoNOJJmomvoT4vPb1No3AaDBEQ8aenwKeo s9gMrwPaFn7qmSRzIf4cqeR4VpU8szZfApGoFp3MeBRXxyatIwv/nD/9xCSUjm51z9o+ gXCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=D94VH2li; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt3-20020a170907728300b007ada030c2e9si6687538ejc.944.2022.11.04.12.16.10; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=D94VH2li; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229634AbiKDSyg (ORCPT + 96 others); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:54:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39846 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229563AbiKDSye (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:54:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4DF50F24 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id g62so5258951pfb.10 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:54:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ymOCm6buEXMesTkew4LPkP5gX6OVyxVyRkGD4N+Jrcw=; b=D94VH2liqWslP5aW/wZJ0ocUJnAOl1YORg0QlqZiBHnDlmlsSluMt6Dj/rHWEkWOYx iKUsxAvK4KZ3aGhOi/ohfoUn7MEayF0hoTuYpJfgGwvt0O+kX/2V9NEM9H+vMTfeuv9S wN4gqgRQ+cLJV8munU4Rf5/pgbKvjhfE9vr8g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ymOCm6buEXMesTkew4LPkP5gX6OVyxVyRkGD4N+Jrcw=; b=IDym3t0cMWs2gMW+n6B/m7z5IsWpwLZPYvyOeNHSyUSi5PKeaSF7pDe0BbbFiyV9Gz 3yDelK19CpgRzevVycfVTyucKmt/XZg9EI65o+haYHzkHkcJ9RZP1a0ZZT5ApYhwfeJm A/JqK4DcGq4yce8sqKwUW/DqxdOAJAWiBy2Q4xIy1ZU2uZy/tI9Ljx/Dn00Ir8AruFBX EvFw5ZWad0Jn81UeA6Hqt5senWkvO4w94h+RbeoHkTHmt1E5rK7HXJwN0oxpOqdQ3lsB 62l3MiUNgsY3l6TWJ8VMu1HWixlc8eSoIux99sj4KLar5w7gxk2y3DpQFef9QsMu6OJK nuMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2j9XDyxEqgb3L+V4UVNVMwcCHI+BJmVM07Wr0usTpUGsT+7prM xM6W+7xPt/W3wLvo/DymVQZECg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4e66:0:b0:456:b3a7:7a80 with SMTP id o38-20020a634e66000000b00456b3a77a80mr30956251pgl.467.1667588072564; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w31-20020a17090a6ba200b0020063e7d63asm68337pjj.30.2022.11.04.11.54.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:54:30 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Evan Green Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, gwendal@chromium.org, apronin@chromium.org, Pavel Machek , Matthew Garrett , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dlunev@google.com, Eric Biggers , Ben Boeckel , jarkko@kernel.org, Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] PM: hibernate: Mix user key in encrypted hibernate Message-ID: <202211041147.DEDC1F64F@keescook> References: <20221103180120.752659-1-evgreen@chromium.org> <20221103105558.v4.9.I87952411cf83f2199ff7a4cc8c828d357b8c8ce3@changeid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221103105558.v4.9.I87952411cf83f2199ff7a4cc8c828d357b8c8ce3@changeid> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:01:17AM -0700, Evan Green wrote: > Usermode may have their own data protection requirements when it comes > to encrypting the hibernate image. For example, users may want a policy > where the hibernate image is protected by a key derived both from > platform-level security as well as authentication data (such as a > password or PIN). This way, even if the platform is compromised (ie a > stolen laptop), sensitive data cannot be exfiltrated via the hibernate > image without additional data (like the user's password). > > The kernel is already doing the encryption, but will be protecting its > key with the TPM alone. Allow usermode to mix in key content of their own > for the data portion of the hibernate image, so that the image > encryption key is determined both by a TPM-backed secret and > user-defined data. > > To mix the user key in, we hash the kernel key followed by the user key, > and use the resulting hash as the new key. This allows usermode to mix > in its key material without giving it too much control over what key is > actually driving the encryption (which might be used to attack the > secret kernel key). > > Limiting this to the data portion allows the kernel to receive the page > map and prepare its giant allocation even if this user key is not yet > available (ie the user has not yet finished typing in their password). > Once the user key becomes available, the data portion can be pushed > through to the kernel as well. This enables "preloading" scenarios, > where the hibernate image is loaded off of disk while the additional > key material (eg password) is being collected. > > One annoyance of the "preloading" scheme is that hibernate image memory > is effectively double-allocated: first by the usermode process pulling > encrypted contents off of disk and holding it, and second by the kernel > in its giant allocation in prepare_image(). An interesting future > optimization would be to allow the kernel to accept and store encrypted > page data before the user key is available. This would remove the > double allocation problem, as usermode could push the encrypted pages > loaded from disk immediately without storing them. The kernel could defer > decryption of the data until the user key is available, while still > knowing the correct page locations to store the encrypted data in. > > Signed-off-by: Evan Green > --- > > (no changes since v2) > > Changes in v2: > - Add missing static on snapshot_encrypted_byte_count() > - Fold in only the used kernel key bytes to the user key. > - Make the user key length 32 (Eric) > - Use CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 for less boilerplate (Eric) > > include/uapi/linux/suspend_ioctls.h | 15 ++- > kernel/power/Kconfig | 1 + > kernel/power/power.h | 1 + > kernel/power/snapenc.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > kernel/power/snapshot.c | 5 + > kernel/power/user.c | 4 + > kernel/power/user.h | 12 +++ > 7 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/suspend_ioctls.h b/include/uapi/linux/suspend_ioctls.h > index b73026ef824bb9..f93a22eac52dc2 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/suspend_ioctls.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/suspend_ioctls.h > @@ -25,6 +25,18 @@ struct uswsusp_key_blob { > __u8 nonce[USWSUSP_KEY_NONCE_SIZE]; > } __attribute__((packed)); > > +/* > + * Allow user mode to fold in key material for the data portion of the hibernate > + * image. > + */ > +struct uswsusp_user_key { > + /* Kernel returns the metadata size. */ > + __kernel_loff_t meta_size; > + __u32 key_len; > + __u8 key[32]; Why is this 32? (Is there a non-literal we can put here?) > + __u32 pad; And why the pad? > +}; > + > #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3' > #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1) > #define SNAPSHOT_UNFREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 2) > @@ -42,6 +54,7 @@ struct uswsusp_key_blob { > #define SNAPSHOT_AVAIL_SWAP_SIZE _IOR(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 19, __kernel_loff_t) > #define SNAPSHOT_ALLOC_SWAP_PAGE _IOR(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 20, __kernel_loff_t) > #define SNAPSHOT_ENABLE_ENCRYPTION _IOWR(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 21, struct uswsusp_key_blob) > -#define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR 21 > +#define SNAPSHOT_SET_USER_KEY _IOWR(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 22, struct uswsusp_user_key) > +#define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAXNR 22 > > #endif /* _LINUX_SUSPEND_IOCTLS_H */ > diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig > index 2f8acbd87b34dc..35bf48b925ebf6 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config ENCRYPTED_HIBERNATION > depends on HIBERNATION_SNAPSHOT_DEV > depends on CRYPTO_AEAD2=y > depends on TRUSTED_KEYS=y > + select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 > default n > help > Enable support for kernel-based encryption of hibernation snapshots > diff --git a/kernel/power/power.h b/kernel/power/power.h > index b4f43394320961..5955e5cf692302 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/power.h > +++ b/kernel/power/power.h > @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct snapshot_handle { > > extern unsigned int snapshot_additional_pages(struct zone *zone); > extern unsigned long snapshot_get_image_size(void); > +extern unsigned long snapshot_get_meta_page_count(void); > extern int snapshot_read_next(struct snapshot_handle *handle); > extern int snapshot_write_next(struct snapshot_handle *handle); > extern void snapshot_write_finalize(struct snapshot_handle *handle); > diff --git a/kernel/power/snapenc.c b/kernel/power/snapenc.c > index 7ff4fc66f7500c..50167a37c5bf23 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/snapenc.c > +++ b/kernel/power/snapenc.c > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -21,6 +22,38 @@ static struct tpm_digest known_digest = { .alg_id = TPM_ALG_SHA256, > 0xf1, 0x22, 0x38, 0x6c, 0x33, 0xb1, 0x14, 0xb7, 0xec, 0x05, > 0x5f, 0x49}}; > > +/* Derive a key from the kernel and user keys for data encryption. */ > +static int snapshot_use_user_key(struct snapshot_data *data) > +{ > + u8 digest[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; > + struct trusted_key_payload *payload = data->key->payload.data[0]; > + struct sha256_state sha256_state; > + > + /* > + * Hash the kernel key and the user key together. This folds in the user > + * key, but not in a way that gives the user mode predictable control > + * over the key bits. > + */ > + sha256_init(&sha256_state); > + sha256_update(&sha256_state, payload->key, SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE); > + sha256_update(&sha256_state, data->user_key, sizeof(data->user_key)); > + sha256_final(&sha256_state, digest); > + return crypto_aead_setkey(data->aead_tfm, > + digest, > + SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE); > +} > + > +/* Check to see if it's time to switch to the user key, and do it if so. */ > +static int snapshot_check_user_key_switch(struct snapshot_data *data) > +{ > + if (data->user_key_valid && data->meta_size && > + data->crypt_total == data->meta_size) { > + return snapshot_use_user_key(data); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* Encrypt more data from the snapshot into the staging area. */ > static int snapshot_encrypt_refill(struct snapshot_data *data) > { > @@ -32,6 +65,15 @@ static int snapshot_encrypt_refill(struct snapshot_data *data) > int pg_idx; > int res; > > + if (data->crypt_total == 0) { > + data->meta_size = snapshot_get_meta_page_count() << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + } else { > + res = snapshot_check_user_key_switch(data); > + if (res) > + return res; > + } > + > /* > * The first buffer is the associated data, set to the offset to prevent > * attacks that rearrange chunks. > @@ -42,6 +84,11 @@ static int snapshot_encrypt_refill(struct snapshot_data *data) > for (pg_idx = 0; pg_idx < CHUNK_SIZE; pg_idx++) { > void *buf = data->crypt_pages[pg_idx]; > > + /* Stop at the meta page boundary to potentially switch keys. */ > + if (total && > + ((data->crypt_total + total) == data->meta_size)) > + break; > + > res = snapshot_read_next(&data->handle); > if (res < 0) > return res; > @@ -114,10 +161,10 @@ static int snapshot_decrypt_drain(struct snapshot_data *data) > sg_set_buf(&data->sg[1 + pg_idx], data->crypt_pages[pg_idx], PAGE_SIZE); > > /* > - * It's possible this is the final decrypt, and there are fewer than > - * CHUNK_SIZE pages. If this is the case we would have just written the > - * auth tag into the first few bytes of a new page. Copy to the tag if > - * so. > + * It's possible this is the final decrypt, or the final decrypt of the > + * meta region, and there are fewer than CHUNK_SIZE pages. If this is > + * the case we would have just written the auth tag into the first few > + * bytes of a new page. Copy to the tag if so. > */ > if ((page_count < CHUNK_SIZE) && > (data->crypt_offset - total) == sizeof(data->auth_tag)) { > @@ -172,7 +219,14 @@ static int snapshot_decrypt_drain(struct snapshot_data *data) > total += PAGE_SIZE; > } > > + if (data->crypt_total == 0) > + data->meta_size = snapshot_get_meta_page_count() << PAGE_SHIFT; > + > data->crypt_total += total; > + res = snapshot_check_user_key_switch(data); > + if (res) > + return res; > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -221,8 +275,26 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_write_next_encrypted(struct snapshot_data *data, > if (data->crypt_offset < (PAGE_SIZE * CHUNK_SIZE)) { > size_t pg_idx = data->crypt_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; > size_t pg_off = data->crypt_offset & (PAGE_SIZE - 1); > + size_t size_avail = PAGE_SIZE; > *buf = data->crypt_pages[pg_idx] + pg_off; > - return PAGE_SIZE - pg_off; > + > + /* > + * If this is the boundary where the meta pages end, then just > + * return enough for the auth tag. > + */ > + if (data->meta_size && (data->crypt_total < data->meta_size)) { > + uint64_t total_done = > + data->crypt_total + data->crypt_offset; > + > + if ((total_done >= data->meta_size) && > + (total_done < > + (data->meta_size + SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE))) { > + > + size_avail = SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE; > + } > + } > + > + return size_avail - pg_off; > } > > /* Use offsets just beyond the size to return the tag. */ > @@ -304,9 +376,15 @@ ssize_t snapshot_write_encrypted(struct snapshot_data *data, > break; > } > > - /* Drain the encrypted buffer if it's full. */ > + /* > + * Drain the encrypted buffer if it's full, or if we hit the end > + * of the meta pages and need a key change. > + */ > if ((data->crypt_offset >= > - ((PAGE_SIZE * CHUNK_SIZE) + SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE))) { > + ((PAGE_SIZE * CHUNK_SIZE) + SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE)) || > + (data->meta_size && (data->crypt_total < data->meta_size) && > + ((data->crypt_total + data->crypt_offset) == > + (data->meta_size + SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE)))) { > > int rc; > > @@ -350,6 +428,8 @@ void snapshot_teardown_encryption(struct snapshot_data *data) > data->crypt_pages[i] = NULL; > } > } > + > + memset(data->user_key, 0, sizeof(data->user_key)); > } > > static int snapshot_setup_encryption_common(struct snapshot_data *data) > @@ -359,6 +439,7 @@ static int snapshot_setup_encryption_common(struct snapshot_data *data) > data->crypt_total = 0; > data->crypt_offset = 0; > data->crypt_size = 0; > + data->user_key_valid = false; > memset(data->crypt_pages, 0, sizeof(data->crypt_pages)); > /* This only works once per hibernate. */ > if (data->aead_tfm) > @@ -661,15 +742,72 @@ int snapshot_set_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data, > return rc; > } > > -loff_t snapshot_get_encrypted_image_size(loff_t raw_size) > +static loff_t snapshot_encrypted_byte_count(loff_t plain_size) > { > - loff_t pages = raw_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + loff_t pages = plain_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; > loff_t chunks = (pages + (CHUNK_SIZE - 1)) / CHUNK_SIZE; > /* > * The encrypted size is the normal size, plus a stitched in > * authentication tag for every chunk of pages. > */ > - return raw_size + (chunks * SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE); > + return plain_size + (chunks * SNAPSHOT_AUTH_TAG_SIZE); > +} > + > +static loff_t snapshot_get_meta_data_size(void) > +{ > + loff_t pages = snapshot_get_meta_page_count(); > + > + return snapshot_encrypted_byte_count(pages << PAGE_SHIFT); > +} > + > +int snapshot_set_user_key(struct snapshot_data *data, > + struct uswsusp_user_key __user *key) > +{ > + struct uswsusp_user_key user_key; > + unsigned int key_len; > + int rc; > + loff_t size; > + > + /* > + * Return the metadata size, the number of bytes that can be fed in before > + * the user data key is needed at resume time. > + */ > + size = snapshot_get_meta_data_size(); > + rc = put_user(size, &key->meta_size); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + rc = copy_from_user(&user_key, key, sizeof(struct uswsusp_user_key)); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + key_len = min_t(__u32, user_key.key_len, sizeof(data->user_key)); > + if (key_len < 8) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Don't allow it if it's too late. */ > + if (data->crypt_total > data->meta_size) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + memset(data->user_key, 0, sizeof(data->user_key)); > + memcpy(data->user_key, user_key.key, key_len); Is struct snapshot_data::user_key is supposed to be %NUL terminated? Or is it just 0-padded up to 32 bytes? If the latter, it might be worth marking struct snapshot_data::user_data with the __non_string attribute. I don't like the dissociation of struct uswsusp_user_key::user_key and struct snapshot_data::user_key, since a mistake here can lead to copying kernel memory into struct snapshot_data::user_key. It would be nice to see something like: BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(data->user_key) < sizeof(user_key.key)); -- Kees Cook