Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cd:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id r13csp1563057rwl; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7zByBdvRRjDxv9HDAStce1d8j/hTihxPJ52LWJoSDe9IrZrH35Dc9oDrsG27hc9IvMKUv1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f786:b0:180:6f9e:23b with SMTP id q6-20020a170902f78600b001806f9e023bmr38531720pln.37.1667602805558; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667602805; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=evf2346V7HtkXdkADy+/rgdaoJJhK9Bsu0RNsyZzi1bWp0X5oXLZoSSHLq+8dFIfBg 6QjmHN7NCmQXjwgGGnjA7pQBFUwqxE5esVBNePaV3IrrjpILDN6Rk+8k1Y9tdiVsLOIa JYZK3+r8oxv/ZXA2fWlKVicPI+9K2xzB3OP2QDRWJqJ3IpCeM5+WaEwyRqJtOFLOdND1 TSYGz3guwsx5g9K4JBcFTIbxPVOGuFvK9LfsSRntD2lcmumhjhermCzU++A8B2+/DIZf NcQz7X3yyOJuWB7sSap6ph9dfAA5S//8CUKWIrgH+eYe/lyUtVNRzg8yScYZidI0K1zY aThA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=5W9EdcBuQ+BX+iYQV757l9mPEjV+CHVF5qhLTO+Fgr8=; b=IeZXJv2/K2OtIU94/yM5GgR3vbKG5vjHEjxkRlt2e3A+/YGP/l2pLMq8UdmoN61z6v 4D148sfUshtBVKY48PKqCx6NL2g7mX0gyAnzNzSSs3drsmKdiOB/ZdPQrD20NWEYr4CM NbJVUUWCgfi/LUxc+1DetzN2wPrD8YjUrc6ZuTxnfVmDZ/RBd3msphm4JOeIqeLQUI7C 5O7jWEQKA6eYROP07KN9KKlTjDrRfFOPtf9O97rfQKiCsxZc7uomgjV0/ngvxYp2UcAR e874JWl5kSvCxr/tctCFxQDEOH6uEaiqod00+s5jrmmJ0LT9DrRgPIgMh7ix7NGrlfqU J5HQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=RD6QhiLk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i16-20020a170902c95000b0016dc27fb9fbsi1193643pla.117.2022.11.04.15.59.53; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=RD6QhiLk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230241AbiKDWlt (ORCPT + 97 others); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:41:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229985AbiKDWkp (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:40:45 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE45B4AF30; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:39:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667601577; x=1699137577; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=3/rM2KyC/x9FhcIHFIgAr562vZ6+pVG10d1tw9A8cn4=; b=RD6QhiLkzJyTfOFSedDqKGmLY8rWgQehYYU5uUWPqnyN3t5QN9DRucHD viVYFPrPJgrlVLQVsmERw3AU8B3ZePWtLsfpjhfrHKcde+BFMkvWtcQdl 3r/I+Q2qb03VV1zdheLB3cLv7bomtw0ezqII6OlUjJlKYyKypIVxgCx/q kdCFx8mN/Bl8R/tZn4CqotgXkbeSmhVGpI7o8MDSbGabW3FXjreg08KRr ogGDTwmFNjMUp4sImHZtk9XUlx1969SsjSiXRLZ0KBMrNgOt62EDNELZc oaVsgGGxnL7ufBkRWneUCUSdThHL98FJJCHMAGEN3L02ULuG7qPpfuOxi Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="311840538" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,138,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="311840538" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2022 15:39:36 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="668514058" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,138,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="668514058" Received: from adhjerms-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO rpedgeco-desk.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.212.227.68]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2022 15:39:35 -0700 From: Rick Edgecombe To: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V . Shankar" , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Yu-cheng Yu Subject: [PATCH v3 15/37] x86/mm: Check Shadow Stack page fault errors Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:35:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20221104223604.29615-16-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20221104223604.29615-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> References: <20221104223604.29615-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Yu-cheng Yu The CPU performs "shadow stack accesses" when it expects to encounter shadow stack mappings. These accesses can be implicit (via CALL/RET instructions) or explicit (instructions like WRSS). Shadow stacks accesses to shadow-stack mappings can see faults in normal, valid operation just like regular accesses to regular mappings. Shadow stacks need some of the same features like delayed allocation, swap and copy-on-write. The kernel needs to use faults to implement those features. The architecture has concepts of both shadow stack reads and shadow stack writes. Any shadow stack access to non-shadow stack memory will generate a fault with the shadow stack error code bit set. This means that, unlike normal write protection, the fault handler needs to create a type of memory that can be written to (with instructions that generate shadow stack writes), even to fulfill a read access. So in the case of COW memory, the COW needs to take place even with a shadow stack read. Otherwise the page will be left (shadow stack) writable in userspace. So to trigger the appropriate behavior, set FAULT_FLAG_WRITE for shadow stack accesses, even if the access was a shadow stack read. Shadow stack accesses can also result in errors, such as when a shadow stack overflows, or if a shadow stack access occurs to a non-shadow-stack mapping. Also, generate the errors for invalid shadow stack accesses. Tested-by: Pengfei Xu Tested-by: John Allen Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Co-developed-by: Rick Edgecombe Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe --- v3: - Improve comment talking about using FAULT_FLAG_WRITE (Peterz) v2: - Update commit log with verbiage/feedback from Dave Hansen - Clarify reasoning for FAULT_FLAG_WRITE for all shadow stack accesses - Update comments with some verbiage from Dave Hansen Yu-cheng v30: - Update Subject line and add a verb arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h index 10b1de500ab1..afa524325e55 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ * bit 3 == 1: use of reserved bit detected * bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access + * bit 6 == 1: shadow stack access fault * bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault */ enum x86_pf_error_code { @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, + X86_PF_SHSTK = 1 << 6, X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, }; diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index 7b0d4ab894c8..0af3d7f52c2e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1138,8 +1138,22 @@ access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR), foreign)) return 1; + /* + * Shadow stack accesses (PF_SHSTK=1) are only permitted to + * shadow stack VMAs. All other accesses result in an error. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) { + if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK))) + return 1; + if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) + return 1; + return 0; + } + if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) { /* write, present and write, not present: */ + if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) + return 1; if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) return 1; return 0; @@ -1331,6 +1345,18 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address); + /* + * To service shadow stack read faults, unlike normal read faults, the + * fault handler needs to create a type of memory that will also be + * writable (with instructions that generate shadow stack writes). + * In the case of COW memory, the COW needs to take place even with + * a shadow stack read. Otherwise the shared page will be left (shadow + * stack) writable in userspace. So to trigger the appropriate behavior + * by setting FAULT_FLAG_WRITE for shadow stack accesses, even if the + * access was a shadow stack read. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) + flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR) -- 2.17.1