Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:59:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:58:55 -0500 Received: from femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.39]:41659 "EHLO femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:58:39 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 04:57:17 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , , In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011206175837.IRKQ15590.femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:49 am, Rik van Riel wrote: > > It's insidious, isn't it? > > Yes, I agree the method you're using to smuggle CML2 into > a stable kernel is insidious. Please stop it. 1) I'm not. You're getting your players confused. 2) I don't think Marcelo would take it, so I wouldn't even bother offering it to him. 3) I'm suggesting that if it does go in the old method doesn't go away, so that people who don't want to use the new stuff don't have to. I think making the old pile of cruft disappear in a stable series IS a bad thing. However, if adding new modular subsystems which people don't have to use (and which require newer tools if you DO want to use them) was a bad thing... Reiser, ext3, and the new vm circa 2.4.10 broke several GUI system monitors... > regards, > > Rik Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/