Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 17:02:42 -0700
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/9] zram: Add recompression algorithm sysfs knob
Message-ID: <Y2WoInfN5fsI7FTL@google.com>
References: <20221018045533.2396670-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
 <20221018045533.2396670-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
 <Y2LP0OWF/WTnkSne@google.com>
 <Y2Mv4l+V9iCv9EMg@google.com>
 <Y2Ptq1GZISCD7Mor@google.com>
 <Y2SEkzKSWx2iQzLl@google.com>
 <Y2U+/xQBwR3MPygL@google.com>
 <Y2WfeLNwkwQZkEi8@google.com>
 <Y2WjCsYrGfUENegL@google.com>
 <Y2Wj7o9nibDr2X0C@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2Wj7o9nibDr2X0C@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 08:44:46AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (22/11/04 16:40), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > Configure 2 alternative algos, with priority 1 and 2
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	echo "name=lz4 priority=1" > recomp_algo
> > > > > 	echo "name=lz5 priority=2" > recomp_algo
> > > > > 
> > > > > Recompress pages using algo 1 and algo 2
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	echo "type=huge threshold=3000 algo_idx=1" > recompress
> > > > > 	echo "type=idle threshold=2000 algo_idx=2" > recompress
> > > > > 
> > > > > Maybe we can even pass algo name instead of idx.
> > > > 
> > > > Let's use name rather than index.
> > > 
> > > OK. Any preference on the keyword? "name="? "algo="? "algorithm="?
> > > "compressor="? "comp="?
> > > 
> > > I want use the same keyword for recomp_algo. I sort of like "algo=",
> > > but not sure.
> > 
> > +1 with algo
> 
> Minchan, I'm sorry I'm getting a bit confused (didn't sleep last night).
> I just saw your other email and you suggested there that we don't need
> any idx or name in recompress. Or did I misunderstand it?
> 

I should have more clear. Sorry for that.

I meant if you need some reason, I prefer "algo=' to make review
proceed. If you agree we don't need it, then, yeah, we are all good.