Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 5 Nov 2022 10:09:32 +0900
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] slab: Provide functional __alloc_size() hints to
 kmalloc_trace*()
Message-ID: <Y2W3zEcMd82B0O1I@hyeyoo>
References: <20221101222520.never.109-kees@kernel.org>
 <20221101223321.1326815-3-keescook@chromium.org>
 <Y2PNVUzHWCg765ml@hyeyoo>
 <202211041121.2F1639D2@keescook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202211041121.2F1639D2@keescook>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:22:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:16:53PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > Since GCC cannot apply the __alloc_size attributes to inlines[1], all
> > > allocator inlines need to explicitly call into extern functions that
> > > contain a size argument. Provide these wrappers that end up just
> > > ignoring the size argument for the actual allocation.
> > > 
> > > This allows CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y to see all various dynamic allocation
> > > sizes under GCC 12+ and all supported Clang versions.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503
> > > 
> > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> > > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> > > Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/slab.h |  8 ++++++--
> > >  mm/slab_common.c     | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> > > index 970e9504949e..051d86ca31a8 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> > > @@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ static_assert(PAGE_SHIFT <= 20);
> > >  
> > >  void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags) __assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1);
> > >  void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc;
> > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
> > > +			     __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(3);
> > >  void *kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> > >  			   gfp_t gfpflags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc;
> > >  void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *objp);
> > > @@ -469,6 +471,8 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_kmalloc_alignm
> > >  							 __alloc_size(1);
> > >  void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment
> > >  									 __malloc;
> > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size)
> > > +				  __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(4);
> > >  
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> > >  void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
> > > @@ -482,7 +486,7 @@ void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
> > >  static __always_inline __alloc_size(3)
> > >  void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
> > >  {
> > > -	void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
> > > +	void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_sized(s, flags, size);
> > >  
> > >  	ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags);
> > >  	return ret;
> > > @@ -492,7 +496,7 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(4)
> > >  void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
> > >  			 int node, size_t size)
> > >  {
> > > -	void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node);
> > > +	void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(s, gfpflags, node, size);
> > >  
> > >  	ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, gfpflags);
> > >  	return ret;
> > > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> > > index 33b1886b06eb..5fa547539a6a 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> > > @@ -1457,6 +1457,20 @@ size_t ksize(const void *objp)
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize);
> > >  
> > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */
> > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
> > > +{
> > > +	return kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_sized);
> > > +
> > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */
> > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size)
> > > +{
> > > +	return kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, flags, node);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized);
> > 
> > The reason that we have two implementations of kmalloc_trace*
> > depending on CONFIG_TRACING is to save additional function call when
> > CONFIG_TRACING is not set.
> > 
> > With this patch there is no reason to keep both.
> > So let's drop #ifdefs and use single implementation in mm/slab_common.c.
> 
> Okay, I'll respin...
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook

Oh, it seems Vlastimil already did that.
Maybe simply drop this patch in next spin?

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/commit/?h=slab/for-6.1-rc4/fixes&id=eb4940d4adf590590a9d0c47e38d2799c2ff9670

Thanks!

-- 
Hyeonggon