Received: by 2002:a05:6358:16cd:b0:dc:6189:e246 with SMTP id r13csp2025534rwl; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 00:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5pB8jRsNgG0no3huEurLyv8VCGhmeJzeeBVDdtFdDTPynwM7DuHnV4bFAKa/pF9j44SFQL X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1dca:b0:7ae:47ee:41c6 with SMTP id og10-20020a1709071dca00b007ae47ee41c6mr2487166ejc.236.1667633525313; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 00:32:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667633525; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oJr0ofzKz9JfAYgsN5YSNDyj9lb8DlOYoPNW+KDbw02ehTVTtSmwaH0IduC4IOfLGF mVZV8P2M4ODEEheYaihWbTnIYkntrUo6IfT9wAkUKWgH12k7DlovpP0OIBSHkYD5PWPj x9sn5LUzSbx232emmU0DqiVZGYA2lMu8gP6cgm6uOoMhp82ni+K6CrcCbEkoFDyE+J4x 6RbVdS8FSmnZYIyXRwWkOmMkw+GDnwMMy3Pe8N4wIFtwh81cbZyTdx5F2AEDbECpefCW BSuzx58Yz/1+UD0k3qcEfOD/xMfAGUx6BWroLAO6IxDWZTnsa9W99wbh01bCawLtq4GD 773Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=srq0262QxbkEV6kNYP4erFtvI0rgH+oqu5/TPMxlwy4=; b=DDY2zLpPOFeY7kN6WIw/zG2fPY8OHNfYLHG3Y5pJBh8ELAomog3TRPzebvkmOClmHI 78rktI4B9Xwh1veEzHLv3lRzCttoGsxlz30chX03nO7MOFNpTrF5cdykYYV56Hg/0X0f SET7n6wZybk3+xYOlYGk1EGiCtp0srXOreZAWP23oZdscgB4O7irbTjJ1hjIkSC23F3y ohmY4L5SC2JATn8blpj6d1soLxho+kzD4EYoQusmu1+JT3GZhxj0ZCYDJN1cZbICs4lO 0Wb7bi3G8mr2LzB//gDGu4eg4VtBUc8Wkc0or56u3FGFRqfVTlv1tASZMoCIl2uGyo4r u3aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=W4KaJP6F; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12-20020a056402268c00b0045cba2d74c3si2312116edd.541.2022.11.05.00.31.42; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 00:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=W4KaJP6F; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229527AbiKEGqD (ORCPT + 97 others); Sat, 5 Nov 2022 02:46:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49004 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbiKEGqC (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Nov 2022 02:46:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A207D186D5 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 23:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id k7so6765448pll.6 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:46:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=srq0262QxbkEV6kNYP4erFtvI0rgH+oqu5/TPMxlwy4=; b=W4KaJP6FV2vwHiDT+VvgaGaA1jeM6SQ8YJpGYx2Pbkhvyt+b8ut77tl012BXpoCSKZ u+nxM1dLCKIVpLHfyXG1p88984BbMhKZGcd9C4F0RT8kncpFr41iKYeXmFz2HFf1Qd2/ RsyWHfwKmiA0qvv+5iNwqot7JBpHFX9AjApgU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=srq0262QxbkEV6kNYP4erFtvI0rgH+oqu5/TPMxlwy4=; b=E05vZK6Yo4oskasLQZW4MEE7BjOOiH6Ceyn1C0uxsd8nQjMjXMO7p3ukNIq8t/6HVx rpFWo0AS03/5Wkz610dEoVNBfwMhLtutVL7yhYGtU4507hQjKufSWchHNfDcu19ch1Fx Sdf6L4yK/4LZPzvXBzHdhgF4cg4xF0RzX1MBh/kYlc2nbpqWkQjcw4T3Sox9hun99//9 DznTo3QYGyaAmifhNHAkhjc0aU43Q5iWWffN7Qycwir8zMprXCk9rHeJEXiJZzOfwP0e SaeYZf1B/gc+Vnn5GpRxwkNeaTn/hitOwDfQ04b86ddza9ZnXzRqiV3UVz0jZCxm2hYj YRTg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0zPi6J8giSmhnU9exLkZSJDJkSnxqFOU8TZsrSPkB31yVXRwT3 cc53gDKG3vVS0QYlKmaawQW8OQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1c6:b0:185:47ce:f4f0 with SMTP id e6-20020a17090301c600b0018547cef4f0mr40384496plh.132.1667630761129; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2-20020a170902d2c200b0018099c9618esm857879plc.231.2022.11.04.23.46.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 23:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 23:45:59 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Gow , Rasmus Villemoes , Guenter Roeck , Andy Shevchenko , Paolo Abeni , Geert Uytterhoeven , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] slab: Provide functional __alloc_size() hints to kmalloc_trace*() Message-ID: <202211042345.B1D74469BC@keescook> References: <20221101222520.never.109-kees@kernel.org> <20221101223321.1326815-3-keescook@chromium.org> <202211041121.2F1639D2@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 10:09:32AM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:22:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:16:53PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Since GCC cannot apply the __alloc_size attributes to inlines[1], all > > > > allocator inlines need to explicitly call into extern functions that > > > > contain a size argument. Provide these wrappers that end up just > > > > ignoring the size argument for the actual allocation. > > > > > > > > This allows CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y to see all various dynamic allocation > > > > sizes under GCC 12+ and all supported Clang versions. > > > > > > > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503 > > > > > > > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka > > > > Cc: Christoph Lameter > > > > Cc: Pekka Enberg > > > > Cc: David Rientjes > > > > Cc: Joonsoo Kim > > > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > > > Cc: Roman Gushchin > > > > Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> > > > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > > > --- > > > > include/linux/slab.h | 8 ++++++-- > > > > mm/slab_common.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h > > > > index 970e9504949e..051d86ca31a8 100644 > > > > --- a/include/linux/slab.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h > > > > @@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ static_assert(PAGE_SHIFT <= 20); > > > > > > > > void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags) __assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1); > > > > void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; > > > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > > > + __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(3); > > > > void *kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > > > > gfp_t gfpflags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; > > > > void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *objp); > > > > @@ -469,6 +471,8 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_kmalloc_alignm > > > > __alloc_size(1); > > > > void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment > > > > __malloc; > > > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size) > > > > + __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(4); > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > > > > void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > > > @@ -482,7 +486,7 @@ void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > > > static __always_inline __alloc_size(3) > > > > void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > > > { > > > > - void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags); > > > > + void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_sized(s, flags, size); > > > > > > > > ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags); > > > > return ret; > > > > @@ -492,7 +496,7 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(4) > > > > void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > > > int node, size_t size) > > > > { > > > > - void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node); > > > > + void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(s, gfpflags, node, size); > > > > > > > > ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, gfpflags); > > > > return ret; > > > > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > > > > index 33b1886b06eb..5fa547539a6a 100644 > > > > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > > > > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > > > > @@ -1457,6 +1457,20 @@ size_t ksize(const void *objp) > > > > } > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize); > > > > > > > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */ > > > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > > > +{ > > > > + return kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags); > > > > +} > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_sized); > > > > + > > > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */ > > > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size) > > > > +{ > > > > + return kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, flags, node); > > > > +} > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized); > > > > > > The reason that we have two implementations of kmalloc_trace* > > > depending on CONFIG_TRACING is to save additional function call when > > > CONFIG_TRACING is not set. > > > > > > With this patch there is no reason to keep both. > > > So let's drop #ifdefs and use single implementation in mm/slab_common.c. > > > > Okay, I'll respin... > > > > -- > > Kees Cook > > Oh, it seems Vlastimil already did that. > Maybe simply drop this patch in next spin? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/commit/?h=slab/for-6.1-rc4/fixes&id=eb4940d4adf590590a9d0c47e38d2799c2ff9670 Oh! Well, yes, that makes that easy. :) -- Kees Cook