Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:04:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:04:47 -0500 Received: from femail37.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.31]:9397 "EHLO femail37.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:04:34 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley To: Alan Cox , stoffel@casc.com (John Stoffel) Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 05:03:12 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011206180432.IHMU19462.femail37.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:25 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that > > was posted? Would that make it more acceptable? > > For 2.5 its a great leap forward. For 2.4 its irrelevant. Its simply not > the way stable kernel trees are run, even for people who think they are > above the rules and traditions Ooh, I can't resist... "You mean like Linus?" (Ducks, runs, looks innocent, runs some more...) Rob P.S. Can we seperate "add new subsystem y prime" and "remove old subsystem y". LIke the new and old SCSI error handling, which have been in the tree in parallel for some time? Did I hear Eric ever suggest removing the old configurator for 2.4? Anybody? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/