Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 6 Nov 2022 12:09:48 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xl?= =?UTF-8?B?aW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: core: Introduce i2c_client_get_device_id
 helper
Message-ID: <20221106120948.0dd617b8@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <Y2bVuYMVew8/h9HE@shikoro>
References: <cover.1667151588.git.ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com>
        <Y2E0BWyvHjPko2TB@smile.fi.intel.com>
        <20221105145658.45b0e9da@jic23-huawei>
        <Y2bVuYMVew8/h9HE@shikoro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 22:29:29 +0100
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:

> > I can do an immutable branch with just the new function call in it if
> > that is useful given I assume this is applicable across a bunch of subsystems?  
> 
> I'd think I should provide the immutable branch with the new I2C API
> call. Feels a bit more logical. Will that work for you as well?
> 

Absolutely. That's even better - I didn't want to assign you work to do :)

Jonathan