Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 6 Nov 2022 12:13:10 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        afd@ti.com, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: use double
 compatibles
Message-ID: <20221106121310.3ad643be@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20221102163136.GA4004075-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20221031182456.952648-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz>
        <20221102163136.GA4004075-robh@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:31:36 -0500
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > As in other bindings, let's use specific compatibles together with the
> > fallback compatible. Adjust the bindings for it.  
> 
> You should state users are already doing this.
> 
I can fix that up whilst applying.  However it raises the question:
Should I treat this as a fix, or a tidy up (that can wait for next merge window)?

I'm also fine with this going with the other patch in the series (that lore
found for me as it didn't go to linux-iio) if that makes more sense.

If that happens

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Jonathan

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > * New patch
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml        | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)  
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>